Timeline for What is the rigorous definition of free will?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1 at 4:31 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 6 at 3:05 | |||||
| Jun 21 at 11:17 | answer | added | Nikos M. | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 11, 2023 at 21:35 | answer | added | SystemTheory | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 11, 2023 at 15:56 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Jul 11, 2023 at 14:41 | vote | accept | user107952 | ||
| Jul 11, 2023 at 9:59 | answer | added | haxor789 | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jul 11, 2023 at 9:29 | comment | added | Hudjefa | @KristianBerry, bravo! Hit the bullseye there. Where I live there are, how do I say this now?, interesting folk. Anyway, as far as I can tell, we maybe able to translate the meaning of free will into relatable everyday, mundane, scenarios. | |
| Jul 11, 2023 at 6:42 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 16, 2023 at 3:10 | |||||
| Jul 11, 2023 at 6:38 | answer | added | Dcleve | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 11, 2023 at 5:41 | answer | added | Roger V. | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 11, 2023 at 3:56 | answer | added | Pertti Ruismäki | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 10, 2023 at 23:12 | comment | added | Kristian Berry | But so the concrete multipossibilism thesis is one "rigorous" definition; Frankfurt's hierarchical/mesh picture is another; and so on and on. And we also might wonder what a rigorous definition of rigor itself is; at any rate, conceptual analysis, whatever its value, is not valuable enough by itself, "just like that," to do the required work, here. | |
| Jul 10, 2023 at 23:11 | comment | added | Kristian Berry | On the academic level, the debate about free will has (as of many years ago) bifurcated between its metaphysical and metaethical aspects. There are resilient intuitions to the effect that moral responsibility can obtain even without a concrete "ability to do otherwise"/"alternative possibilities" (see e.g. the work of Harry Frankfurt), so either we go on to try to undermine appeals to such intuitions generally, show a contradiction in our intuitions here in particular, or something else. Of course, there are also formal ideas about practical reasoning that support other contentions. | |
| Jul 10, 2023 at 22:21 | history | asked | user107952 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |