Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link
J D
  • 35.5k
  • 4
  • 30
  • 125

So with hard determinism a bank robber or rapist might argue: “It’s not my fault that I robbed the bank or raped the woman, I had no choice, so I shouldn’t go to jail for it”.

The counter argument is “Sorry mate but putting you into jail is not our fault,fault; we had no choice”.

So with hard determinism a bank robber or rapist might argue: “It’s not my fault that I robbed the bank or raped the woman, I had no choice, so I shouldn’t go to jail for it”.

The counter argument is “Sorry mate but putting you into jail is not our fault, we had no choice”.

So with hard determinism a bank robber or rapist might argue: “It’s not my fault that I robbed the bank or raped the woman, I had no choice, so I shouldn’t go to jail for it”.

The counter argument is “Sorry mate but putting you into jail is not our fault; we had no choice”.

Source Link
gnasher729
  • 5.8k
  • 12
  • 18

So with hard determinism a bank robber or rapist might argue: “It’s not my fault that I robbed the bank or raped the woman, I had no choice, so I shouldn’t go to jail for it”.

The counter argument is “Sorry mate but putting you into jail is not our fault, we had no choice”.