Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 18, 2021 at 13:57 answer added Guy Inchbald timeline score: 0
Jul 18, 2021 at 4:48 answer added niels nielsen timeline score: 0
Apr 12, 2014 at 14:04 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhilosophy/status/454983451863945217
Apr 10, 2014 at 11:46 history edited Mozibur Ullah CC BY-SA 3.0
added 87 characters in body
Apr 10, 2014 at 11:29 comment added Mozibur Ullah Allegranza: I was making a humourous point. I think one has to understand the arc of french philosophical & political thought to begin to make sense of it - in the sense of being able to critique it. Possibly exposition of his thought leaves something to be desired. The anthropologists insight, if we assume professional courtesy in that he hasn't mangled the thought, is to translate it into the categories of thought that make sense to us philosophically.
Apr 10, 2014 at 10:54 comment added Mauro ALLEGRANZA The interesting thing - for my point of view - is not so much that a primitive society like the Bushong produce an individual able to "think" as Heraclitus did (but this is the way in which the anthropologist has "translated" - with insight - the narration of the Bushong), but that after around 3,000 years of culture and "intellectual evolution" we still loose time with the "primitive narration" of a Bushong-philosopher like Badiou.
Apr 9, 2014 at 21:00 answer added Dave timeline score: 5
Apr 9, 2014 at 20:45 history asked Mozibur Ullah CC BY-SA 3.0