Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhilosophy/status/126689834336129024

occurred Oct 19, 2011 at 16:03

Rollback to Revision 6

Link

edited Aug 27, 2011 at 15:03

Joseph Weissman ♦

9.7k
8
48
86

If I agree with paraconsistency, how to I decide which way Is it possible to deny {A , ¬A} ⊨ Bthat affirming a logical contradiction implies every possible proposition?

Rollback to Revision 5

Link

edited Aug 21, 2011 at 18:36

Joseph Weissman ♦

9.7k
8
48
86

Is it possible If I agree with paraconsistency, how to I decide which way to deny that affirming a logical contradiction implies every possible proposition{A , ¬A} ⊨ B?

Rollback to Revision 3

Link

edited Aug 21, 2011 at 14:47

Joseph Weissman ♦

9.7k
8
48
86

If I agree with paraconsistency, how to I decide which way Is it possible to deny {A , ¬A} ⊨ Bthat affirming a logical contradiction implies every possible proposition?

edited title

Link

edited Aug 20, 2011 at 18:02

Tofusoul

356
1
6

Loading

edited title

Link

edited Aug 20, 2011 at 17:55

Tofusoul

356
1
6

Loading

deleted 2 characters in body; edited title

Source Link

edited Aug 19, 2011 at 1:55

Joseph Weissman ♦

9.7k
8
48
86

Loading

Attempted to reformulate title for clarity

Link

edited Aug 18, 2011 at 22:56

Joseph Weissman ♦

9.7k
8
48
86

Loading

Source Link

asked Aug 18, 2011 at 6:18

Tofusoul

356
1
6

Loading

Stack Exchange Network

Return to Question

If I agree with paraconsistency, how to I decide which way Is it possible to deny {A , ¬A} ⊨ Bthat affirming a logical contradiction implies every possible proposition?

Is it possible If I agree with paraconsistency, how to I decide which way to deny that affirming a logical contradiction implies every possible proposition{A , ¬A} ⊨ B?

If I agree with paraconsistency, how to I decide which way Is it possible to deny {A , ¬A} ⊨ Bthat affirming a logical contradiction implies every possible proposition?