Timeline for Does psychophysical harmony strongly point toward theism?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22 at 5:16 | answer | added | variableization | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 20 at 12:10 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 25 at 3:01 | |||||
| Feb 19 at 22:54 | comment | added | user66156 | @Absinthe Maybe this might help then: youtu.be/9b_OliHxaAs | |
| Feb 19 at 22:33 | comment | added | Absinthe | @Mark Thanks for the pointer. As someone that works with numbers, I still can't agree that "Google's answer to Pi / 7" is a theory; it's scientific mathematical fact. Happy to be pointed to new routes of explanation. | |
| Feb 19 at 21:48 | comment | added | user66156 | @Absinthe If you don't understand the paper, watch this video: youtu.be/uk-2FdSVy10. If you do understand the paper, but don't understand the question, I'm basically asking if the argument is sound. | |
| Feb 19 at 21:36 | comment | added | Absinthe | Agree with @DavidGudeman; every respect for the level of detail, but still have no idea what you're asking; please simplify. I have a degree in psychology, qualifications in counselling, worked as a programmer for 20 years and still can't fathom the logic requested. | |
| Feb 19 at 8:06 | answer | added | armand | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 19 at 7:11 | answer | added | Professor Sushing | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 17 at 22:10 | answer | added | Baby_philosopher | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 17 at 22:08 | answer | added | Alsee | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 17 at 21:39 | comment | added | Scott Rowe | There's no substitute for having a vast universe and all time available to get things to work out by accident. Do you have any idea of the staggering number of beings that have already lived? It wouldn't seem as unlikely that some did eventually become successful. | |
| Feb 17 at 20:20 | history | edited | user66156 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 103 characters in body
|
| Feb 17 at 17:13 | comment | added | user66156 | @rus9384 They address other views in the paper. | |
| Feb 17 at 17:06 | comment | added | rus9384 | Well, the dualism assumption is an easy weak point. | |
| Feb 17 at 16:08 | history | edited | user66156 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 535 characters in body
|
| Feb 17 at 15:37 | answer | added | NotThatGuy | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 17 at 14:22 | comment | added | user66156 | @DavidGudeman Done. | |
| Feb 17 at 14:22 | history | edited | user66156 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3776 characters in body
|
| Feb 17 at 13:55 | comment | added | user66156 | @DavidGudeman I will try. In the meantime, you can read the paper, or watch these videos: link1, link2, link3. | |
| Feb 17 at 11:58 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Feb 17 at 11:49 | comment | added | David Gudeman | Thanks for the extensive quotes, but after reading all of it, I still have no idea what he means by psychophysical harmony. Maybe you could add another paragraph where he gives an example or two. | |
| Feb 17 at 4:10 | answer | added | Dcleve | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 17 at 1:38 | history | edited | user66156 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1216 characters in body
|
| Feb 17 at 1:25 | history | asked | user66156 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |