Timeline for Perception vs Fact
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2016 at 2:05 | comment | added | MmmHmm | "Cogito ergo sum" non "dubito ergo sum" | |
| Apr 29, 2014 at 11:00 | comment | added | TwoThe | If even Mathematics are based on "believes" I think it is safe to assume, that there is nothing that can be proven so well that it cannot be wrong. See my part about Descartes. | |
| Apr 29, 2014 at 5:06 | comment | added | fantom | But again, we are getting into that "scientists BELIEVED" or "scientists THOUGHT" when I was specifically asking for TESTED and CONFIRMED facts. FACT, by definition, means something that cannot be wrong. | |
| Apr 28, 2014 at 11:06 | comment | added | TwoThe | Correct. But he did destroy many things, scientists at that time believed to be facts. | |
| Apr 28, 2014 at 9:13 | comment | added | Michael Borgwardt | Einstein did not destroy any experimental observation "facts", he merely created a theory that explained them in a different way which also explained other observations that the previous theory couldn't. | |
| Apr 27, 2014 at 23:00 | vote | accept | fantom | ||
| Aug 3, 2014 at 23:10 | |||||
| Apr 27, 2014 at 10:50 | history | answered | TwoThe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |