Timeline for If the supernatural were real, would we be able to study it scientifically?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15 at 14:03 | comment | added | g s | @ScottRowe Works for me. If you can convince everybody to start calling the scientific method 'the experimentalist's method' instead, I'll vote for you for definition dictator. | |
| Jun 15 at 12:26 | comment | added | Scott Rowe | This is a great explanation! It is true that we only study things that have already happened. Given that, we could include these historical methods in with the methods of science generally and just call history 'science'. It would have 2 kinds: stuff we can run again and stuff we can't. | |
| Jun 15 at 6:57 | history | edited | g s | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Jun 15 at 6:51 | history | answered | g s | CC BY-SA 4.0 |