Timeline for What is the "opposite" of equivocation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
2 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12 at 20:14 | comment | added | tkp | Nnnyeah, I suppose. But I was hoping for something more...formal, or more explanatory. A pronouncement of "equivocation!" not only names that fallacy, but it also reveals something about its mechanism. By contrast, it feels like, "distinction without a difference!" does only the naming. But I'd never actually heard of "distinction without a difference" being classed as a fallacy until now, so maybe it's just I haven't seen it enough in that light. +1 nevertheless. | |
| Aug 12 at 19:46 | history | answered | Conifer Travis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |