Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 31 at 1:47 answer added Dcleve timeline score: 0
Oct 29 at 23:54 answer added NotThatGuy timeline score: 0
Oct 29 at 18:59 history became hot network question
Oct 29 at 18:05 answer added Shaun Phillips timeline score: -2
Oct 29 at 14:57 answer added Jo Wehler timeline score: 1
Oct 29 at 13:57 answer added haxor789 timeline score: 1
Oct 29 at 11:55 answer added Pertti Ruismäki timeline score: 3
Oct 29 at 11:42 comment added Kristian Berry That seems more like word games and shuffling around of random definitions of randomness and determination. One determinist response to hard free will theories is that the concept underlying the theories is itself logically unstable, which is not a terrible criticism but can be leveled then at the concept of determination as well (c.f. the SEP entry on determinates and determinables, for example).
Oct 29 at 11:37 comment added Syed @KristianBerry Yes, there is. You have three options A, B, and C. Option A gets picked with no further cause. Where’s the determinism here? I think a better point to make would be that even under determinism, those very laws are often presumed to exist without anything creating them. In that sense, those laws may be “random”.
Oct 29 at 11:29 comment added Kristian Berry Is there a philosophy of randomness that doesn't just devolve into determinism? If there's no definition or theory of randomness that doesn't bring in some kind of abstract determination to explain what randomness is and how it differs from supposed alternatives, then perhaps the distinction between random and determined is on an absolute level illusory (or equivalently, it's a relative difference rather than an absolute one).
Oct 29 at 11:15 answer added tkruse timeline score: 2
Oct 29 at 10:59 history asked Syed CC BY-SA 4.0