Timeline for Is uncertainty relative?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17 at 12:10 | comment | added | Him | You are looking for what is called a "local hidden variables theory". This is testable and the answer seems to be no. | |
| Nov 17 at 11:47 | history | edited | Muhammad Ikhwan Perwira | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Nov 17 at 11:41 | history | edited | Muhammad Ikhwan Perwira | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 380 characters in body
|
| Nov 17 at 11:27 | answer | added | Speakpigeon | timeline score: 0 | |
| S Nov 17 at 10:55 | vote | accept | Muhammad Ikhwan Perwira | ||
| Nov 17 at 7:44 | answer | added | Professor Sushing | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 16 at 23:31 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 9 at 3:02 | |||||
| Nov 16 at 23:23 | vote | accept | Muhammad Ikhwan Perwira | ||
| S Nov 17 at 10:55 | |||||
| Nov 16 at 21:01 | history | edited | Muhammad Ikhwan Perwira | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 36 characters in body
|
| Nov 16 at 19:47 | comment | added | Muhammad Ikhwan Perwira | @keshlam Yes, I admitted my argument was wrong. One-shot photon will still constructing wave interference. | |
| Nov 16 at 15:05 | comment | added | keshlam | Websearch "single photon double slit experiment". | |
| Nov 16 at 14:42 | comment | added | Muhammad Ikhwan Perwira | @keshlam One-shot photon is not enough to create wave interference pattern, thus it needs to be shot many times (observing over time) so that the final position of photons are clear, constructing distribution probability of every position. | |
| Nov 16 at 14:15 | comment | added | keshlam | This is a physical question, not a philosophy question. My immediate reaction is that your theory does not address the double slit experiment, but for a more detailed analysis take it to the physics stack. | |
| S Nov 16 at 14:04 | review | First questions | |||
| Nov 16 at 23:24 | |||||
| S Nov 16 at 14:04 | history | asked | Muhammad Ikhwan Perwira | CC BY-SA 4.0 |