Timeline for Can Fallibilism itself be fallible?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8 at 0:58 | comment | added | Scott Rowe | Who would lie about going to Russia? On the other hand, "Only Nixon could go to China." Whew! | |
| Dec 8 at 0:49 | history | edited | Philomath | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
formatting
|
| Dec 7 at 16:38 | comment | added | User198 | Hi. "Fallibilism is less of an explanation of the world around us and more an explanation of the limit of human knowledge." So this means that fallibilism is more of like a perpetual investigations activity, than some kind of constructive theory. It says that all can be further questioned rather than trying to "prove" or construct anything like some other philosophical theories or schools try to do. Do you agree? | |
| Dec 7 at 16:05 | review | Late answers | |||
| Dec 9 at 20:47 | |||||
| Dec 7 at 15:46 | history | answered | Tristan OOF | CC BY-SA 4.0 |