Timeline for What are the philosophical implications of Tarski's truth definition?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2016 at 15:21 | history | edited | Joseph Weissman♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 163 characters in body; edited title
|
| May 18, 2014 at 9:27 | vote | accept | essay | ||
| May 17, 2014 at 22:49 | answer | added | Abe Rikki | timeline score: -1 | |
| May 17, 2014 at 22:05 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhilosophy/status/467788041621630976 | ||
| May 17, 2014 at 20:22 | answer | added | sequitur | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 17, 2014 at 19:01 | answer | added | Mozibur Ullah | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 17, 2014 at 18:50 | comment | added | Mauro ALLEGRANZA | You can see at least Tarski's Truth Definitions and Truth. The literature on it is huge. Tarski's formal approach to truth is a support for modern form of the correspondence theories of truth, which are "consonant with" common sense views about truth. | |
| May 17, 2014 at 17:49 | review | First posts | |||
| May 18, 2014 at 0:58 | |||||
| May 17, 2014 at 17:30 | history | asked | essay | CC BY-SA 3.0 |