Timeline for Would it be good, if everyone was good?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
26 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2022 at 1:06 | answer | added | Ray Butterworth | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 4, 2022 at 23:46 | comment | added | user63148 | I'd be good, and you'd be good. What is "it"? I think you've confused language if you are asking whether good things are good, absolutism aside (not gonna pretend I fully understood Russell "is there an absolute good", but it is readily available on-line... I'm guessing, post hoc, he's saying that good things can conflict) | |
| Nov 4, 2022 at 15:11 | comment | added | Futilitarian | Evil in Utopia? might be of interest. | |
| S Nov 4, 2022 at 8:43 | history | suggested | Roger V. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
formatting
|
| Nov 3, 2022 at 13:37 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 4, 2022 at 8:43 | |||||
| Nov 3, 2022 at 13:10 | answer | added | Allart | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 31, 2015 at 10:27 | history | protected | user2953 | ||
| Dec 14, 2015 at 9:52 | history | edited | user2953 |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 29, 2014 at 13:31 | vote | accept | Piotr Chojnacki | ||
| Jul 2, 2014 at 1:01 | answer | added | Guill | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 27, 2014 at 22:26 | answer | added | Mozibur Ullah | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 27, 2014 at 18:15 | answer | added | k0pernikus | timeline score: 2 | |
| S Jun 27, 2014 at 15:21 | history | edited | Ryder | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
the first sentence was a bit confusing
|
| S Jun 27, 2014 at 15:21 | history | suggested | user2683 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
the first sentence was a bit confusing
|
| Jun 27, 2014 at 10:59 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhilosophy/status/482478296392011776 | ||
| Jun 27, 2014 at 9:18 | answer | added | Mike de Klerk | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 27, 2014 at 6:32 | comment | added | firtydank | @Niel I don't know if Sutton's aim is to justify such a strong premise (his book is not about philosophy or deeper truths), but it's an interesting psychological observation none the less. | |
| Jun 27, 2014 at 6:00 | answer | added | Anonymous Entity | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 26, 2014 at 23:30 | comment | added | Niel de Beaudrap | @firtydank: isn't that like saying that it's a good thing that some people act like jerks, because otherwise some people might act like jerks? If the premise is that perfect social harmony is unstable, one should just say so. | |
| Jun 26, 2014 at 23:15 | answer | added | user2683 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 26, 2014 at 23:00 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 27, 2014 at 15:21 | |||||
| Jun 26, 2014 at 19:06 | answer | added | Michael Lee | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 26, 2014 at 14:49 | answer | added | alfred | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jun 26, 2014 at 14:19 | comment | added | firtydank | This is not a philosophical answer but in "The No Asshole Rule" Sutton writes about research that shows that having a "token asshole" around actually makes everybody else behave better. We seem to be better behaved if we have a role-model of bad behaviour - i.e. whatever you do, don't do what (that asshole) would. | |
| Jun 26, 2014 at 12:23 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 26, 2014 at 16:02 | |||||
| Jun 26, 2014 at 12:02 | history | asked | Piotr Chojnacki | CC BY-SA 3.0 |