Timeline for If the universe has a beginning does that prove God exists?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Nov 2, 2014 at 18:12 | history | suggested | tshepang | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
we waited for too long :)
|
| Nov 2, 2014 at 6:22 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 2, 2014 at 18:12 | |||||
| Apr 4, 2014 at 9:50 | comment | added | Battle of Karbala | God never come to existence. you assumed God has come to existence. | |
| Nov 29, 2012 at 13:17 | comment | added | Battle of Karbala | what is the scientific citation that virtual particle have no cause for their existence? | |
| Nov 29, 2012 at 12:25 | comment | added | Battle of Karbala | your link braungardt.com/Physics/Vacuum%20Fluctuation.htm is irrelevant. | |
| Nov 29, 2012 at 12:10 | comment | added | Battle of Karbala | @MoziburUllah random in computer is based on its clock. if you can predict very exact parts of time you can predict the place of points. it is not really random. | |
| Oct 20, 2011 at 3:02 | comment | added | Mozibur Ullah | @BeatMe: Surely this depends on exactly what you mean by cause? If I ran a program on a computer and I got points randomly appearing and disappearing on a monitor, if someone was then to ask what causes those points to flicker; surely the best answer would be I just ran 'flashing sparks' program. Analogously could I not then say the cause of virtual particles is the 'choice' of physical theory? | |
| Oct 11, 2011 at 3:43 | comment | added | Sklivvz | Virtual particles do not come into existence at all. That's why they are called virtual. | |
| Oct 11, 2011 at 1:34 | comment | added | Niel de Beaudrap | @Neil Meyer: you presume that you have explained it once in the first place; I didn't notice, frankly. | |
| Oct 10, 2011 at 17:43 | history | edited | Cooking_1987687 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 99 characters in body
|
| Oct 10, 2011 at 17:22 | history | migrated | from christianity.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Oct 10, 2011 at 16:51 | comment | added | El'endia Starman | @Neil: As appealing as it is, comments are not the place to discuss. Take it to chat. | |
| Oct 10, 2011 at 16:48 | comment | added | Neil Meyer | Do I need to explain again why the idea of who created the creator is fallacious? | |
| Oct 10, 2011 at 16:33 | history | answered | Cooking_1987687 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |