Skip to main content
Tried to simplify/clarify
Source Link

How can POM contribute toshould we characterize the relationship between mathematics and philosophy of mathematics?

Does POM give anything practical to Mathematics? Or does it just try to explainHow should we characterize the nature of numbers?

If I'm to try to make a new fieldrelationship between mathematics and philosophy of mathematics, do I need to be necessarily a philosopher? Is it better to be a philosopher?

I want to know whether POM is separated from or adds to Mathematics. For exampleSpecifically, does itin what ways might the study of philosophy of mathematics make a mathematician better at his work?

I read a post that was something like "POM talks about the nature of numbers". I read some of Wikipedia's article on Philosophy of Mathematics, and it wasn't farwhich contributions from that. For example, Wikipedia's article mentions this: "Mathematical realism, like realism in general, holds that mathematical entities exist independently of the human mind." I can't see that as helping a mathematician. I can't see how a mathematician can "potentially" solve equations better, or discover/construct a useful fieldphilosophy of mathematics by putting this quote in mind.

My motivation is that I like to look at things from their roots and go up. So, is POM where I should start,might be considered the most critical or is POM irrelevanturgent to the progress of Mathematicsmathematicians?

How can POM contribute to mathematics?

Does POM give anything practical to Mathematics? Or does it just try to explain the nature of numbers?

If I'm to try to make a new field of mathematics, do I need to be necessarily a philosopher? Is it better to be a philosopher?

I want to know whether POM is separated from or adds to Mathematics. For example, does it make a mathematician better at his work?

I read a post that was something like "POM talks about the nature of numbers". I read some of Wikipedia's article on Philosophy of Mathematics, and it wasn't far from that. For example, Wikipedia's article mentions this: "Mathematical realism, like realism in general, holds that mathematical entities exist independently of the human mind." I can't see that as helping a mathematician. I can't see how a mathematician can "potentially" solve equations better, or discover/construct a useful field of mathematics by putting this quote in mind.

My motivation is that I like to look at things from their roots and go up. So, is POM where I should start, or is POM irrelevant to the progress of Mathematics?

How should we characterize the relationship between mathematics and philosophy of mathematics?

How should we characterize the relationship between mathematics and philosophy of mathematics?

Specifically, in what ways might the study of philosophy of mathematics make a mathematician better at his work, and which contributions from philosophy of mathematics might be considered the most critical or urgent to mathematicians?

Post Reopened by Joseph Weissman
added 847 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link

Does POM give anything practical to Mathematics? Or does it just try to explain the nature of numbers?

If I'm to try to make a new field of mathematics, do I need to be necessarily a philosopher? Is it better to be a philosopher?

I want to know whether POM is separated from or adds to Mathematics. For example, does it make a mathematician better at his work?

I read a post that was something like "POM talks about the nature of numbers". I read some of Wikipedia's article on Philosophy of Mathematics, and it wasn't far from that. For example, Wikipedia's article mentions this: "Mathematical realism, like realism in general, holds that mathematical entities exist independently of the human mind." I can't see that as helping a mathematician. I can't see how a mathematician can "potentially" solve equations better, or discover/construct a useful field of mathematics by putting this quote in mind.

My motivation is that I like to look at things from their roots and go up. So, is POM where I should start, or is POM irrelevant to the progress of Mathematics?

Does POM give anything practical to Mathematics? Or does it just try to explain the nature of numbers?

If I'm to try to make a new field of mathematics, do I need to be necessarily a philosopher? Is it better to be a philosopher?

Does POM give anything practical to Mathematics? Or does it just try to explain the nature of numbers?

If I'm to try to make a new field of mathematics, do I need to be necessarily a philosopher? Is it better to be a philosopher?

I want to know whether POM is separated from or adds to Mathematics. For example, does it make a mathematician better at his work?

I read a post that was something like "POM talks about the nature of numbers". I read some of Wikipedia's article on Philosophy of Mathematics, and it wasn't far from that. For example, Wikipedia's article mentions this: "Mathematical realism, like realism in general, holds that mathematical entities exist independently of the human mind." I can't see that as helping a mathematician. I can't see how a mathematician can "potentially" solve equations better, or discover/construct a useful field of mathematics by putting this quote in mind.

My motivation is that I like to look at things from their roots and go up. So, is POM where I should start, or is POM irrelevant to the progress of Mathematics?

Post Undeleted by Joseph Weissman
Post Merged (destination) from philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/1520/…
Post Closed as "not constructive" by Joseph Weissman
Source Link
wajed
  • 811
  • 1
  • 7
  • 8

How can POM contribute to mathematics?

Does POM give anything practical to Mathematics? Or does it just try to explain the nature of numbers?

If I'm to try to make a new field of mathematics, do I need to be necessarily a philosopher? Is it better to be a philosopher?