Does POM give anything practical to Mathematics? Or does it just try to explainHow should we characterize the nature of numbers?
If I'm to try to make a new fieldrelationship between mathematics and philosophy of mathematics, do I need to be necessarily a philosopher? Is it better to be a philosopher?
I want to know whether POM is separated from or adds to Mathematics. For exampleSpecifically, does itin what ways might the study of philosophy of mathematics make a mathematician better at his work?
I read a post that was something like "POM talks about the nature of numbers". I read some of Wikipedia's article on Philosophy of Mathematics, and it wasn't farwhich contributions from that. For example, Wikipedia's article mentions this: "Mathematical realism, like realism in general, holds that mathematical entities exist independently of the human mind." I can't see that as helping a mathematician. I can't see how a mathematician can "potentially" solve equations better, or discover/construct a useful fieldphilosophy of mathematics by putting this quote in mind.
My motivation is that I like to look at things from their roots and go up. So, is POM where I should start,might be considered the most critical or is POM irrelevanturgent to the progress of Mathematicsmathematicians?