Timeline for What is the logical connectives of Then?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2014 at 4:39 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhilosophy/status/525869305619959809 | ||
| Oct 22, 2014 at 8:53 | comment | added | Mauro ALLEGRANZA | But your argument is ambiguous; what does it mean : "if football is not more demanding than tennis, that does not hold". What is "that" ? The argument is : (1) A and B → C ; (2) ¬A → ¬ ? From (1) and (2) C follows. If (2) is simply ¬A, the argument does not conclude, i.e. bot C and ¬C are "compatible" with the premise. | |
| Oct 22, 2014 at 6:03 | comment | added | Mauro ALLEGRANZA | The logical conncetive is "If ___, then ...", i.e. the conditional: P → Q is false only when P is true and Q is false. | |
| Oct 21, 2014 at 15:09 | answer | added | user935 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 21, 2014 at 14:33 | answer | added | Araucaria - Not here any more. | timeline score: 1 | |
| S Oct 21, 2014 at 12:42 | history | suggested | Shadow Wizard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
No need to shout.
|
| Oct 21, 2014 at 12:35 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 21, 2014 at 12:42 | |||||
| Oct 21, 2014 at 12:35 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 21, 2014 at 12:43 | |||||
| Oct 21, 2014 at 12:30 | history | asked | user10490 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |