Timeline for The Fallacy of Contraposition for Counterfactuals?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2016 at 15:28 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Apr 11, 2016 at 8:11 | |||||
| Aug 2, 2015 at 14:10 | answer | added | user5172 | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 3, 2015 at 21:04 | history | edited | user8572 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 136 characters in body
|
| Dec 3, 2014 at 18:32 | answer | added | Quentin Ruyant | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 2, 2014 at 20:26 | answer | added | user9166 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 1, 2014 at 15:08 | comment | added | user935 | You're assuming knowledge on Boris' part that he doesn't have. Statement 2: if O had not gone and Boris knew in advance that O was not going... THEN Boris would go. But since Boris doesn't know, he doesn't go because he assumes O will be there regardless. | |
| Nov 1, 2014 at 13:53 | history | asked | user8572 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |