Timeline for Problem of old evidence
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2015 at 18:16 | comment | added | Chris Sunami | Just trying to provide an intuitive justification for the mathematical rule --I'm guessing that's not what you're looking for. | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 17:47 | comment | added | innisfree | Can you write that in math? I can't see how you'd reach that conclusion without p(E)=1, which is the point I'm challenging. | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 17:07 | comment | added | Chris Sunami | I was trying to address that in the middle paragraph, will edit to be more clear. | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 17:06 | history | edited | Chris Sunami | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 264 characters in body
|
| Jan 28, 2015 at 16:40 | comment | added | innisfree | thanks all the same, let me make sure the question is clear. | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 16:33 | comment | added | innisfree | whilst most of this is (trivially) true, i can't see how it relates to the problem of old evidence? | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 15:44 | history | answered | Chris Sunami | CC BY-SA 3.0 |