Timeline for Are we born with Kantian Categories?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:42 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://philosophy.stackexchange.com/ with https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Dec 20, 2015 at 1:50 | history | edited | sourcepov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added link to related Phil.SE questions, and enhanced my language argument with Chomsky's input on the crucial role of grammar.
|
Dec 19, 2015 at 18:46 | comment | added | sourcepov | I will. Always digging. Some days, it's like a treasure hunt. Thanks for the feedback. | |
Dec 18, 2015 at 4:50 | comment | added | Mozibur Ullah | ...until you reach something original. | |
Dec 18, 2015 at 4:47 | comment | added | Mozibur Ullah | @sourcepov: keep digging... | |
Dec 18, 2015 at 4:36 | comment | added | sourcepov | Ok, I suppose I should defer, but I did some more digging, and found Noam Chomsky had some ideas on this (attributing the ability for inductive reasoning to newborns .. and kittens, by the way). @MoziburUllah do you find the language argument as a prerequisite for understanding and deductive reasoning not a factor in this? | |
Dec 17, 2015 at 4:20 | comment | added | Mozibur Ullah | But it's unsurprising that the gist of the question wasn't caught, as the question was short and ambiguous; I'd probably say born with, as opposed to born into. | |
Dec 17, 2015 at 4:12 | comment | added | Mozibur Ullah | -1: I'd go along with Klockings clarification; this is what I was essentially asking about. | |
Dec 17, 2015 at 2:51 | history | edited | sourcepov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added Wittgenstein reference
|
Dec 16, 2015 at 22:12 | comment | added | Philip Klöcking♦ | To clarify: It is correct that we are born with them in the sense that they are modes of the synthesis of intuition, it is wrong that we are born with them as concepts. Ability yes, concept no. | |
Dec 16, 2015 at 16:38 | history | answered | sourcepov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |