Skip to main content
added 42 characters in body
Source Link
user2953
user2953

There are no logical proofs to exclude miracles.

A naturalistic worldview tries to explain the world without referring to miracles. Up to now, naturalism is quite successful (it is the world view underlying science).

When hearing about a miracle naturalism strongly recommends to make a careful analysis of the data first: What did really happen? Are there reliable witnesses?

There are no logical proofs to exclude miracles.

A naturalistic worldview tries to explain the world without referring to miracles. Up to now, naturalism is quite successful.

When hearing about a miracle naturalism strongly recommends to make a careful analysis of the data first: What did really happen? Are there reliable witnesses?

There are no logical proofs to exclude miracles.

A naturalistic worldview tries to explain the world without referring to miracles. Up to now, naturalism is quite successful (it is the world view underlying science).

When hearing about a miracle naturalism strongly recommends to make a careful analysis of the data first: What did really happen? Are there reliable witnesses?

edited body
Source Link
Jo Wehler
  • 42.7k
  • 3
  • 39
  • 121

There are no logical proofs to exclude miracles.

A naturalistic worldview tries to explain the world without referring to miracles. Up to now, naturalism is quite successful.

When hearing about a miracle naturalism strongly recommends to make a careful analysis of the data first: What did really happen? ÀreAre there reliable witnesses?

There are no logical proofs to exclude miracles.

A naturalistic worldview tries to explain the world without referring to miracles. Up to now, naturalism is quite successful.

When hearing about a miracle naturalism strongly recommends to make a careful analysis of the data first: What did really happen? Àre there reliable witnesses?

There are no logical proofs to exclude miracles.

A naturalistic worldview tries to explain the world without referring to miracles. Up to now, naturalism is quite successful.

When hearing about a miracle naturalism strongly recommends to make a careful analysis of the data first: What did really happen? Are there reliable witnesses?

Source Link
Jo Wehler
  • 42.7k
  • 3
  • 39
  • 121

There are no logical proofs to exclude miracles.

A naturalistic worldview tries to explain the world without referring to miracles. Up to now, naturalism is quite successful.

When hearing about a miracle naturalism strongly recommends to make a careful analysis of the data first: What did really happen? Àre there reliable witnesses?