Timeline for Concepts with inexistant definitions but for which our common intuition is enough for practical usage
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 5, 2018 at 15:46 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhilosophy/status/949306097105502208 | ||
Jan 4, 2018 at 18:25 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Dec 5, 2017 at 18:57 | comment | added | Cort Ammon | What about just using the word "intuitive?" It's a bit circular, but quite accurate. | |
Dec 5, 2017 at 18:11 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Nov 5, 2017 at 17:22 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Oct 6, 2017 at 16:10 | answer | added | Allen More | timeline score: 1 | |
Oct 6, 2017 at 15:59 | comment | added | TheAutomaton | I think it’s because these ideas are very broad and are relative to the individual | |
Oct 6, 2017 at 13:14 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Sep 6, 2017 at 11:54 | answer | added | user20253 | timeline score: 1 | |
Sep 5, 2017 at 12:52 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Aug 6, 2017 at 12:44 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jul 7, 2017 at 12:17 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jun 7, 2017 at 11:23 | answer | added | Franz | timeline score: 2 | |
Jun 6, 2017 at 23:29 | answer | added | user26700 | timeline score: 0 | |
Jun 6, 2017 at 23:02 | comment | added | user20153 | the usual term is "concept" ;). few if any concepts can be "accurately defined." Like "red". | |
Jun 6, 2017 at 22:19 | comment | added | Alexander S King | You seem to be hinting at some of late Wittgenstein's ideas of "meaning as use" and "language game", and the related "meaning holism". | |
Jun 6, 2017 at 21:06 | comment | added | user9166 | 'word' There is no such think as an extant clear definition not dependent upon intuition to back it up. I think you are talking about anything other than an artificial model. And even such a model does not make sense until you get the intuition of what it was intending to model. | |
Jun 6, 2017 at 20:51 | answer | added | Eliot G York | timeline score: 0 | |
Jun 6, 2017 at 18:05 | comment | added | Mauro ALLEGRANZA | Vague concepts. | |
Jun 6, 2017 at 17:26 | history | asked | Remi.b | CC BY-SA 3.0 |