Skip to main content
Trying to answer the question directly.. I was thinking something entirely different before
Source Link

The pricing function says you can have the resource if you do the work.

Your question/argument says that solipsism is false because of computationally infeasible resources for bitcoin transactions.

That really has nothing to do with the definition of solipsism.

But I could agree with you, given a definition of self, that extended beyond the mind; If world were mind for the the solipsist. Which is contrary to the accepted definition of solipsism as it exists today.

I would file your question as a research question. This site is not "for" research. It is "about" accepted facts in the literature; So you can get a quick answer that is verified. I hope you can appreciate that for what it is. I'm new to this site, and find it hard to distinguish between research and accepted fact for a variety of reasons; most notably the concept of progress.

The pricing function says you can have the resource if you do the work.

Your question/argument says that solipsism is false because of computationally infeasible resources for bitcoin transactions.

That really has nothing to do with the definition of solipsism.

But I could agree with you, given a definition of self, that extended beyond the mind; If world were mind for the the solipsist. Which is contrary to the accepted definition of solipsism as it exists today.

I would file your question as a research question. This site is not "for" research. It is "about" accepted facts in the literature; So you can get a quick answer that is verified. I hope you can appreciate that for what it is. I'm new to this site, and find it hard to distinguish between research and accepted fact for a variety of reasons; most notably the concept of progress.

The pricing function says you can have the resource if you do the work.

Your question/argument says that solipsism is false because of computationally infeasible resources for bitcoin transactions.

That really has nothing to do with the definition of solipsism.

But I could agree with you, given a definition of self, that extended beyond the mind; If world were mind for the solipsist. Which is contrary to the accepted definition of solipsism as it exists today.

I would file your question as a research question. This site is not "for" research. It is "about" accepted facts in the literature; So you can get a quick answer that is verified. I hope you can appreciate that for what it is. I'm new to this site, and find it hard to distinguish between research and accepted fact for a variety of reasons; most notably the concept of progress.

Trying to answer the question directly.. I was thinking something entirely different before
Source Link

HaveThe pricing function says you heard of Zero Knowledge Proof systems?can have the resource if you do the work.

ThereYour question/argument says that solipsism is an article here entitled How to Explain Zero-Knowledge Protocols to Your Childrenfalse because of computationally infeasible resources for bitcoin transactions.

I think solipsism is true, because in my mind I would never wantThat really has nothing to hurt or damagedo with the earth in any way. A leave-no-trace kinddefinition of approachsolipsism. 

But the facts are contrary to that view. ThereforeI could agree with you, by using the ideagiven a definition of ZKPself, you could say that extended beyond the present state ofmind; If world were mind for the Earththe solipsist. Which is a virtual reality, because I am not ablecontrary to leave-no-trace andthe accepted definition of solipsism as it exists today.

I want towould file your question as a research question. This site is not "for" research. It is "about" accepted facts in the literature; So you can get a quick answer that is verified. I know my own mind that's abouthope you can appreciate that for what it (solipsism)is. I'm new to this site, and find it hard to distinguish between research and accepted fact for a variety of reasons; most notably the concept of progress.

Have you heard of Zero Knowledge Proof systems?

There is an article here entitled How to Explain Zero-Knowledge Protocols to Your Children

I think solipsism is true, because in my mind I would never want to hurt or damage the earth in any way. A leave-no-trace kind of approach. But the facts are contrary to that view. Therefore, by using the idea of ZKP, you could say that the present state of the Earth is a virtual reality, because I am not able to leave-no-trace and I want to. I know my own mind that's about it (solipsism).

The pricing function says you can have the resource if you do the work.

Your question/argument says that solipsism is false because of computationally infeasible resources for bitcoin transactions.

That really has nothing to do with the definition of solipsism. 

But I could agree with you, given a definition of self, that extended beyond the mind; If world were mind for the the solipsist. Which is contrary to the accepted definition of solipsism as it exists today.

I would file your question as a research question. This site is not "for" research. It is "about" accepted facts in the literature; So you can get a quick answer that is verified. I hope you can appreciate that for what it is. I'm new to this site, and find it hard to distinguish between research and accepted fact for a variety of reasons; most notably the concept of progress.

Source Link

Have you heard of Zero Knowledge Proof systems?

There is an article here entitled How to Explain Zero-Knowledge Protocols to Your Children

I think solipsism is true, because in my mind I would never want to hurt or damage the earth in any way. A leave-no-trace kind of approach. But the facts are contrary to that view. Therefore, by using the idea of ZKP, you could say that the present state of the Earth is a virtual reality, because I am not able to leave-no-trace and I want to. I know my own mind that's about it (solipsism).