Skip to main content
29 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 20, 2018 at 10:15 comment added user20253 Mr Pink is an ambiguous character here. You don't make it clear whether he is a dreamer or a serious researcher. Do his claims contradict science? Does he claim knowledge or is he speculating? Meanwhile Mr Black is making a dreadful mistake in thinking that all knowledge is demonstrable and empirical. I'd say both are making a mistake but the only technical fallacy would be the claim that all knowledge is empirical. All claims should be proved by evidence but not all evidence is demonstrable. In short I feel the question is ambiguous.
Oct 19, 2018 at 23:22 history edited McMahon CC BY-SA 4.0
Updated context
Oct 19, 2018 at 23:16 history edited McMahon CC BY-SA 4.0
Updated context
Oct 19, 2018 at 23:11 history edited McMahon CC BY-SA 4.0
Updated context
Mar 31, 2018 at 11:04 comment added Ben It's called just "refusing to listen to" Mr Black because Mr Black is being a jerk. It's not a fallacy he's just declining to engage in the argument at all.
Mar 31, 2018 at 0:07 comment added Lawrence Your question (how to deal with a certain category of people) doesn't match its title (the name of that category). Which are you asking?
Mar 30, 2018 at 20:54 answer added Shufflepants timeline score: 2
Mar 30, 2018 at 12:20 comment added Lee This sounds like a hand-wave to me: rationalwiki.org/wiki/Handwave
Mar 29, 2018 at 22:03 answer added strangepoop timeline score: 1
Mar 29, 2018 at 15:04 comment added JAB @barrycarter Though solipsism is probably not a good belief system if the rest of the world actually does exist.
Mar 29, 2018 at 9:10 comment added JBentley Relevant Wikipedia articles: cognitive dissonance, confirmation bias, belief perseverance
Mar 28, 2018 at 21:27 answer added Kevin timeline score: 10
Mar 28, 2018 at 19:53 comment added thanby Considering the discourse in the answers/comments, this question is probably better-suited for Interpersonal:SE, because it's more about how Mr Black handles interactions with Mr Pink.
Mar 28, 2018 at 18:48 comment added user935 Keep in mind that, outside of your own existence, you can't really "prove" anything at all, even that there is an outside reality. So there is no fundamental truth. It's all belief.
S Mar 28, 2018 at 18:02 history suggested Drise CC BY-SA 3.0
removed tanks from end, other superfluous remarks.
Mar 28, 2018 at 17:47 history tweeted twitter.com/StackPhilosophy/status/979052285333557248
Mar 28, 2018 at 17:45 review Suggested edits
S Mar 28, 2018 at 18:02
S Mar 28, 2018 at 16:37 history suggested Thunderforge CC BY-SA 3.0
Now that this is a Hot Network Question, making the title more descriptive
Mar 28, 2018 at 16:37 review Suggested edits
S Mar 28, 2018 at 16:37
Mar 28, 2018 at 16:36 history edited McMahon CC BY-SA 3.0
clarification
Mar 28, 2018 at 16:23 answer added Geoffrey Thomas timeline score: 10
Mar 28, 2018 at 16:22 answer added elliot svensson timeline score: 3
Mar 28, 2018 at 16:12 answer added Chris Sunami timeline score: 55
Mar 28, 2018 at 15:32 answer added Frank Hubeny timeline score: 4
Mar 28, 2018 at 15:16 answer added JeffUK timeline score: 11
Mar 28, 2018 at 15:06 answer added MichaelK timeline score: 20
Mar 28, 2018 at 14:59 history edited McMahon CC BY-SA 3.0
added 4 characters in body
Mar 28, 2018 at 14:55 review First posts
Mar 29, 2018 at 3:06
Mar 28, 2018 at 14:53 history asked McMahon CC BY-SA 3.0