Timeline for Worldview hierarchy. Epistemology or ontology more fundamental?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 10, 2018 at 5:07 | comment | added | Tim B II | True, but consider this thought experiment; completely fill a HDD with data, then put it on a shelf. At the same time, put a human baby in a sensory deprivation chamber for 20 years, with no contact to the outside world. Neither the HDD or the deprived human have the capacity to form a worldview. If intelligence is the ability to detect patterns in observations, then both the raw data and intelligence are required to make something meaningful. It's even arguable that the Flynn effect is a consequence of information being more freely available, thus boosting pattern matching capability. | |
Apr 10, 2018 at 4:03 | comment | added | Phil C | I've been resting on a similar conclusion. I just find it frustratingly unsatisfying. | |
Apr 10, 2018 at 3:39 | comment | added | Phil C | Fair point about there being some equally bugnutty "realists" out there as well. | |
Apr 10, 2018 at 3:26 | history | answered | Tim B II | CC BY-SA 3.0 |