Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 17, 2020 at 8:34 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Apr 18, 2018 at 19:31 comment added Luaan @AnoE Nah, it's probably the appropriate level of response considering the question - it's not like the OP asks for all that we know and don't know about the Big Bang. And it's not really wrong, it just doesn't explore all the plausible possibilities (which again makes sense in the context of who the document is targeted at). No need to include even more caveats.
Apr 18, 2018 at 16:39 comment added AnoE @Luaan, yeah, a frequent analogy would also often be a balloon being pumped up, which is wrong on so many levels... the part you brought up stated (that it may not even require a infinite universe) is included in the very small "if" in In fact, if the whole universe is infinitely large now; I would leave the quote as is, the answer is quite long already. Or did you feel it's really misleading as it stands now?
Apr 18, 2018 at 9:30 comment added Luaan For your Harvard quote, note that it's not even required for the big bang to have occurred in a larger universe - when people try to imagine the topology of the universe, they usually use analogies like "warped piece of paper", which intuitively lead to the idea of something being "out there", beyond the bounds of the paper. But that isn't required at all - for example, if you represent wind direction as a 1 dimensional quantity (N->E->S->W->N), it clearly loops back on itself (no start or end), can be pictured as a circle, but has no "inside" or "outside". There's so many possibilities.
Apr 16, 2018 at 11:40 comment added Tensibai In your last sentence, I think you mean 'irrefutable proof that does not works without'.
Apr 12, 2018 at 21:31 history edited AnoE CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 3 characters in body
Apr 12, 2018 at 20:58 history answered AnoE CC BY-SA 3.0