Timeline for Do premises need to be valid conclusions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 8:34 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Aug 5, 2018 at 2:45 | vote | accept | Jonathon Anderson | ||
| Aug 3, 2018 at 18:32 | comment | added | Jonathon Anderson | Re-reading this, I think the answer to my follow up question is that an argument can be sound without using a formal argument to prove the truth of the premises. I could use a formal argument, or I could base truth on knowledge in the ways you mention. | |
| Aug 3, 2018 at 16:47 | comment | added | Jonathon Anderson | Does the same hold true for the soundness of the argument? (TIL: I did not use the strict logical definition of validity) | |
| Aug 3, 2018 at 6:01 | history | edited | Mauro ALLEGRANZA | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 147 characters in body
|
| Aug 2, 2018 at 19:21 | history | edited | Mauro ALLEGRANZA | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 27 characters in body
|
| Aug 2, 2018 at 19:05 | history | edited | Mauro ALLEGRANZA | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Aug 2, 2018 at 18:17 | history | edited | Mauro ALLEGRANZA | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 219 characters in body
|
| Aug 2, 2018 at 18:12 | history | edited | Mauro ALLEGRANZA | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 219 characters in body
|
| Aug 2, 2018 at 18:06 | history | answered | Mauro ALLEGRANZA | CC BY-SA 4.0 |