Timeline for With regard to the methodological incommensurability, does Kuhn talk about astrology?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2021 at 11:29 | comment | added | TKoL |
(Paul R. Thagard, 'Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience', PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 1978, Volume One: Contributed Papers (1978), pp. 223-234 : 228) any way i can read this online?
|
|
| Aug 6, 2018 at 17:22 | comment | added | Geoffrey Thomas♦ | @David Thornley. I once did some work on astrology in order to give a talk on it; and my impression agrees perfectly with yours. Thanks for comment. | |
| Aug 6, 2018 at 17:13 | comment | added | David Thornley | When I was studying astrology, I noticed that there was almost no reference to experience or observation. There were some generally agreed-upon principles, and more or less valid reasoning from them. This is very definitely not science. | |
| Aug 6, 2018 at 11:46 | history | answered | Geoffrey Thomas♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |