Timeline for Where did Rorty claim no essential difference between Philosophy and Literary Criticism/Theory?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 5, 2020 at 3:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhilosophy/status/1290844980995674112 | ||
S Aug 5, 2020 at 1:52 | history | suggested | Tsundoku |
add tag 'rorty'
|
|
Aug 2, 2020 at 20:33 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Aug 5, 2020 at 1:52 | |||||
Jan 31, 2019 at 15:52 | answer | added | Nick Gall | timeline score: 2 | |
Sep 22, 2018 at 21:38 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
Sep 16, 2018 at 8:42 | answer | added | Geoffrey Thomas♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
Sep 15, 2018 at 19:51 | comment | added | Conifold | Rorty claimed a lot more than that, in the Mirror of Nature he characterized "the entire culture, from physics to poetry, as a single, continuous, seamless activity in which the divisions are merely institutional and pedagogical". His inspiration is of course Derrida, "there is nothing outside the text". See Have any philosophers applied the concept of “underdetermination” to non-scientific contexts? | |
Sep 14, 2018 at 19:56 | history | edited | Philip Klöcking♦ |
edited tags
|
|
Sep 14, 2018 at 11:31 | comment | added | user20253 | I hope not. It doesn't say much for Rorty's philosophical approach, It's a view that seems to depend on not understanding philosophy.any better than Finnegan;s Wake. | |
Sep 14, 2018 at 5:48 | history | asked | user8572 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |