Timeline for Objectivist Aesthetics and the Jungian Archetypes
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S yesterday | history | bounty started | Man of faith | ||
| S yesterday | history | notice added | Man of faith | Authoritative reference needed | |
| Dec 26, 2018 at 20:59 | comment | added | Lucretius | I'm thinking about formulating this into a more complete answer (it could easily be a book). I would argue that not only was she trying to present such archetypes using her fictional work to be both practical and inspirational but she was also trying to drag a culture heading in the opposite direction along with her kicking and screaming. | |
| Oct 24, 2018 at 22:30 | history | edited | Jonathan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Oct 24, 2018 at 22:28 | comment | added | Jonathan | I guess I should have elaborated a bit better: I meant Rand's objectivist aesthetics and if the effect or relateability or how it helps people understand metaphysics or ethics better... and is it a similar effect to Jungian shadow, archetypes that are somehow so instantly relatable to people. | |
| Oct 24, 2018 at 22:10 | comment | added | Philip Klöcking♦ | Hello, I very much like the gist of the question - even if I am not qualified to answer it - but I would like to ask you to kind of clarify the question: Are you asking for "relations", e.g. a similar psychological or argumental function stated within the corresponding theories, or rather for material similarities between the descriptions of Jungian symbolic archetypes and Rand's/Piekoff's symbolic pieces of arts? This may be important since the former has more philosophical weight while the latter (still on-topic) aspect would probably be an expression of similar cultural backgrounds. | |
| Oct 24, 2018 at 22:00 | history | asked | Jonathan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |