Skip to main content
66 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 29 at 18:03 history edited Julius Hamilton CC BY-SA 4.0
added 78 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Jan 13 at 5:33 review Close votes
Jan 15 at 1:32
Mar 23, 2021 at 17:00 comment added Some Guy Any religious book with religious followers is a book that rational people believe was written by god
Apr 23, 2018 at 14:49 comment added user20253 I would say yes, there is a way. But there are 30 answers already and it's too much to read before answering fully, while my answer would require a long essay. If our idea of God is of an objective being then there would be no way, and as most people have this idea of God then for most people the answer will be that there is no way.
Apr 23, 2018 at 10:29 answer added user3559630 timeline score: 1
Nov 26, 2016 at 22:54 history protected user2953
Nov 23, 2016 at 22:10 answer added Jordan Evans timeline score: -1
Nov 22, 2016 at 17:04 answer added Chris Sunami timeline score: 0
Nov 22, 2016 at 14:16 answer added Matas Vaitkevicius timeline score: 0
Nov 6, 2015 at 18:28 comment added Rodrigo Interesting how you say "a god" (any god), and most answers talk about "God"...
Sep 12, 2015 at 11:19 answer added gnasher729 timeline score: 1
Sep 12, 2015 at 9:43 answer added Honey timeline score: 1
Jan 5, 2015 at 23:11 vote accept JDH
Jan 5, 2015 at 23:11 comment added JDH On the math-related sites where I am active (such as MathOverflow), the policy is that it is entirely the OP's discretion. But having now looked at all the answers again, I realized that Geoffroy makes the most compelling general argument.
Jan 5, 2015 at 16:05 comment added Lennart Regebro You can change your mind if a better one comes along. It's usually how SE type sites work.
Jan 5, 2015 at 14:18 comment added JDH @LennartRegebro Why? Although I have enjoyed the answers, yours particularly, I don't think that any of the answers are definitive.
Jan 5, 2015 at 9:53 comment added Lennart Regebro You should select an answer for this question.
Oct 17, 2014 at 12:15 answer added havoc timeline score: -1
Feb 8, 2014 at 21:45 answer added J126 timeline score: 1
Jan 29, 2014 at 3:51 answer added user6552 timeline score: 1
Jan 8, 2014 at 8:43 comment added Superbest I think the caption of this question ("What would it take...") is unanswerable unless the answerer is God (and I don't believe I've seen Him post on this site so far). What's worse, the question doesn't even ask if there is proof of God in existence (if it did, you could get away by relaying the word of God) - it asks the human answerer to imagine and describe such a statement that is impossible for a human to imagine and describe and can only originate from God.
Nov 19, 2013 at 0:41 comment added user4801 Dear Professor Hamkins, are you still active in philosophy forum? I have many questions in philosophical aspects of logical and set theoretical theorems and phenomenons and I will be really happy to know your attitude about them because you have a valuable experience in both realms of logic and philosophy and your answers could be really useful.
Nov 18, 2013 at 15:11 answer added Eduardo Serra timeline score: 1
May 26, 2013 at 9:55 answer added Neil Meyer timeline score: 0
Mar 17, 2013 at 16:23 answer added John timeline score: 0
Mar 15, 2013 at 12:33 comment added Joe Z. If there is no answer to this question, then the claim that there is no god is unfalsifiable. Am I correct?
Feb 9, 2013 at 8:47 answer added Giles Humphry timeline score: -4
Feb 4, 2013 at 19:02 answer added Mohammad Al-Turkistany timeline score: -6
Sep 23, 2012 at 23:37 answer added Doug Spoonwood timeline score: 0
Sep 23, 2012 at 16:11 comment added celtschk How would you know that whoever hands it to you is god?
Sep 13, 2012 at 18:29 comment added Mark Rosenblitt-Janssen Well, it could be handed to me directly by G-d, that would be convincing... But I guess that happened, if you consider Moses. Such is the reason, I suppose, why the Jews continue to defend their truth.
Aug 25, 2012 at 15:18 answer added philosodad timeline score: 6
Aug 17, 2012 at 9:30 comment added robin girard Mr. Smith Goes to Washington says "Liberty is too Precious a thing to be buried in books". Couldn't this be rephrased for love/god ? in the end this shows that books are weak attempts to render something that is inside our souls ? or could your soul be so finite that it can be buried in a book ?
Aug 17, 2012 at 8:18 comment added p.a. Although hardly a religious person, I m sceptic of.. sceptics. Ridiculizing scriptures respected by millions is hardly a wise thing. Granted, religions are responsible for most wars and miseries, at least being a trigger for most geopolitical conflicts to date. However, could any sceptic reply, what would our society be with abiding to any ethical (supernaturally provided, for obvious reasons) framework? Would people ever abide to just "logic", "rationalism", "balancing nature on a scale"? Maybe our life would then be more misrable and catastrophic. What do you think?
Aug 16, 2012 at 7:36 comment added mart Can God, if existing, pose a philosophical or moral questions so difficult even God self could not answer it? If yes, it could be written down and may be the proof of Gods existance. But can a beeing that is not able to answer this question be considered an allmighty God?
Jul 19, 2012 at 17:04 answer added Dario timeline score: 2
Jul 18, 2012 at 4:04 comment added Tames considering that such thing happens, it seems to be unfrequent. Why would that be so? What would be the requirements for this to happen?
Jul 18, 2012 at 3:35 comment added Mozibur Ullah Some Sufi doctrines hold that the universe itself is the great quoran. Our attempts to probe & understanding it, is the attempt to read it.
May 21, 2012 at 11:35 comment added Cees Timmerman A coupon for an all-inclusive weekend trip to the Restaurant at the End of the Universe, followed by a personally guided tour of the beginning up until I click my heels to redeem the coupon would probably convince me.
Feb 29, 2012 at 17:20 comment added stoicfury Simple: it would require proof. How does one prove that a book was written by or inspired by God (or anything for that matter)? I would have to observe such writing or inspiration occurring such that there could be no explanation other than that a God did it (and therefore exists). Thus, this question is really just a veiled way of asking "How can we prove the existence of God?" (although the OP may not have realized this when writing the question).
Oct 24, 2011 at 6:39 comment added Hans-Peter Stricker I once was told by a friend of Muslim belief that the Coran was written by God is proved by the fact, that so many people know it by heart.
Aug 24, 2011 at 3:55 answer added eMansipater timeline score: 2
Aug 23, 2011 at 20:22 answer added Geoffroy CALA timeline score: 13
Aug 20, 2011 at 0:37 answer added Alpha timeline score: 2
Jul 24, 2011 at 11:15 answer added Tgr timeline score: 1
Jul 15, 2011 at 14:15 answer added Saeed Neamati timeline score: -4
Jul 15, 2011 at 7:56 answer added Computer Scientist timeline score: 13
Jul 12, 2011 at 17:38 answer added Erin K Carmody timeline score: 4
Jul 4, 2011 at 11:52 comment added Cody Gray Many would argue that our existing religious texts contain solutions to scientific and/or mathematical problems that were considered extremely challenging or even insurmountable at the time. It's hard to imagine that either of the examples you give will never be solved by humans at some eventual point in the future.
Jun 25, 2011 at 16:30 history edited JDH CC BY-SA 3.0
added 246 characters in body; edited title
Jun 24, 2011 at 21:41 answer added Xodarap timeline score: 6
Jun 24, 2011 at 17:12 answer added Alexander timeline score: 4
Jun 24, 2011 at 2:53 history edited Joseph Weissman
edited tags
Jun 23, 2011 at 18:49 answer added Jon Ericson timeline score: 35
Jun 23, 2011 at 17:29 answer added Chad timeline score: 5
Jun 23, 2011 at 16:13 comment added Lennart Regebro What a bout one million humans from the future? :-)
Jun 23, 2011 at 13:29 comment added John Bentin I would become a Believer if the book contained readable, flawless, and elegant proofs that settled both the Riemann Hypothesis and the P=(?)NP conjecture. It is just conceivable that a human could do one, but not both.
Jun 23, 2011 at 13:11 history edited JDH CC BY-SA 3.0
added 14 characters in body; edited tags
Jun 23, 2011 at 12:53 comment added JDH @Raskolnikov, of course I agree with that; my question is what it would take in a book to convince a rational agent that it was from a god. In particular, I take this to imply that it was not written by a human, but indeed this would be a weaker claim.
Jun 23, 2011 at 12:34 answer added Lennart Regebro timeline score: 57
Jun 23, 2011 at 10:52 answer added Mark Lapierre timeline score: 2
Jun 23, 2011 at 10:37 comment added Raskolnikov Not written by humans doesn't necessarily imply written by a supernatural being.
Jun 23, 2011 at 10:24 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhilosophy/status/83842749610209280
Jun 23, 2011 at 7:46 answer added robin girard timeline score: 2
Jun 23, 2011 at 3:49 history edited JDH CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 1173 characters in body
Jun 23, 2011 at 3:34 history asked JDH CC BY-SA 3.0