Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/StackPhilosophy/status/1113682791127031808
Became Hot Network Question
grammar
Source Link
Frank Hubeny
  • 19.8k
  • 7
  • 32
  • 100

I got this question from Logic, laws of truth, by Nicholas J.J Smith.

He says (page 24) :

"A connective is truth functional if it has the property that the truth or falsity of a compound proposition formed from the connective and some other propositions is completely determined by the truth or falsity of those component propositions."

I don't really seem to be able to appreciate the usefulness of truth-functional connectives.

Perhaps, I don't understand what he is saying in that paraparagraph, so I would appreciate any explanation of what he is trying to say and why truth-functional connectives are useful.

Also (if you want to..) can you guys explain what Nicholas means when he says "  ...this proposition has no internal structure  ..."?

I got this question from Logic, laws of truth, by Nicholas J.J Smith.

He says (page 24) :

"A connective is truth functional if it has the property that the truth or falsity of a compound proposition formed from the connective and some other propositions is completely determined by the truth or falsity of those component propositions."

I don't really seem to be able to appreciate the usefulness of truth-functional connectives.

Perhaps, I don't understand what he is saying in that para, so I would appreciate any explanation of what he is trying to say and why truth-functional connectives are useful.

Also (if you want to..) can you guys explain what Nicholas means when he says "  ...this proposition has no internal structure  ..."

I got this question from Logic, laws of truth, by Nicholas J.J Smith.

He says (page 24) :

"A connective is truth functional if it has the property that the truth or falsity of a compound proposition formed from the connective and some other propositions is completely determined by the truth or falsity of those component propositions."

I don't really seem to be able to appreciate the usefulness of truth-functional connectives.

Perhaps, I don't understand what he is saying in that paragraph, so I would appreciate any explanation of what he is trying to say and why truth-functional connectives are useful.

Also (if you want to) can you guys explain what Nicholas means when he says "...this proposition has no internal structure..."?

edited title
Link
E...
  • 6.7k
  • 4
  • 24
  • 43

(Short question) When is a connective truth functional?

formatting
Source Link
Mauro ALLEGRANZA
  • 41.1k
  • 3
  • 41
  • 92

I got this question from Logic, laws of truth, by Nicholas J.J Smith.

He says (in his book) = "A connective truth is functional if it has the property that the truth or falsity of a compound proposition formed from the connective and some other propositions is completely determined by the truth or falsity of those component propositions."page 24) :

"A connective is truth functional if it has the property that the truth or falsity of a compound proposition formed from the connective and some other propositions is completely determined by the truth or falsity of those component propositions."

I don't really seem to be able to appreciate the usefulness of truth-functional connectives.

Perhaps, I don't understand what he is saying in that para, so I would appreciate any explanation of what he is trying to say and why truth-functional connectives are useful.

Also (if you want to..) can you guys explain what Nicholas means when he says " ...this proposition has no internal structure ..."

I got this question from Logic, laws of truth, by Nicholas J.J Smith.

He says (in his book) = "A connective truth is functional if it has the property that the truth or falsity of a compound proposition formed from the connective and some other propositions is completely determined by the truth or falsity of those component propositions.")

I don't really seem to be able to appreciate the usefulness of truth-functional connectives.

Perhaps, I don't understand what he is saying in that para, so I would appreciate any explanation of what he is trying to say and why truth-functional connectives are useful.

Also (if you want to..) can you guys explain what Nicholas means when he says " ...this proposition has no internal structure ..."

I got this question from Logic, laws of truth, by Nicholas J.J Smith.

He says (page 24) :

"A connective is truth functional if it has the property that the truth or falsity of a compound proposition formed from the connective and some other propositions is completely determined by the truth or falsity of those component propositions."

I don't really seem to be able to appreciate the usefulness of truth-functional connectives.

Perhaps, I don't understand what he is saying in that para, so I would appreciate any explanation of what he is trying to say and why truth-functional connectives are useful.

Also (if you want to..) can you guys explain what Nicholas means when he says " ...this proposition has no internal structure ..."

added 138 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading