Timeline for Are the conclusions we draw from science inherently more certain than those we draw from history?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2020 at 18:18 | comment | added | Ted Wrigley | @puppetsock: I'm sorry, but that's still unclear. Please write grammatical sentences, because I cannot interpret semaphore. | |
| Feb 28, 2020 at 18:12 | comment | added | puppetsock | Theory<==>Experiment Theory<=/=>No experiment That's the point. | |
| Feb 28, 2020 at 18:10 | comment | added | Ted Wrigley | @puppetsock: I'm not getting your point, and I don't see the relation (or the importance) to the point I was making. Can you explain? | |
| Feb 28, 2020 at 18:07 | comment | added | puppetsock | Yeah, but nobody is throwing "graviton" theories around like they are proved. Except a few stringy types, who get laughed at. | |
| Feb 28, 2020 at 18:06 | comment | added | Ted Wrigley | @puppetsock: a gravity wave is not a graviton. One is a macro-scale effect and the other a proposed subatomic particle. | |
| Feb 28, 2020 at 18:04 | comment | added | puppetsock | Gravity waves more than once. ligo.caltech.edu/page/what-is-ligo Indeed, coincident detection at multiple detectors was an important feature. So an individual gravity wave more than once, on several occasions. | |
| Feb 28, 2020 at 17:12 | history | answered | Ted Wrigley | CC BY-SA 4.0 |