Timeline for Must a self-legislating citizenry guarantee itself freedom of speech?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2013 at 15:06 | comment | added | Dave | Still not a must: you might be able to argue that the absence of the clause is less optimal (according to some metric), but it doesn't entail the elimination of the capacity for self legislation. | |
| Jul 9, 2013 at 3:52 | comment | added | Michael Allan | But continued self legislation is a premise. I think it's possible that the qualifier "continued" can turn a "should" into a "must". If you agree, please consider editing your answer. | |
| Jul 8, 2013 at 8:58 | history | answered | k0pernikus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |