Skip to main content
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
'doesn't replaces 'doesnt'' 'don't' replaces 'dont'
Source Link
Geoffrey Thomas
  • 36.1k
  • 4
  • 46
  • 148

Logical statement doesntdoesn't make sense mathematically

Does the statement " If you get an A, then you can eat ice cream" logically concludes that "if you dontdon't get an A then you can not eat Iceice cream"?? Why doesntdoesn't it work mathematically? Because P-->Q and not P --> not Q dontdon't have the same truth table.

Logical statement doesnt make sense mathematically

Does the statement " If you get an A, then you can eat ice cream" logically concludes that "if you dont get an A then you can not eat Ice cream"?? Why doesnt it work mathematically? Because P-->Q and not P --> not Q dont have the same truth table.

Logical statement doesn't make sense mathematically

Does the statement " If you get an A, then you can eat ice cream" logically concludes that "if you don't get an A then you can not eat ice cream"?? Why doesn't it work mathematically? Because P-->Q and not P --> not Q don't have the same truth table.

Source Link

Logical statement doesnt make sense mathematically

Does the statement " If you get an A, then you can eat ice cream" logically concludes that "if you dont get an A then you can not eat Ice cream"?? Why doesnt it work mathematically? Because P-->Q and not P --> not Q dont have the same truth table.