Timeline for Is argument that two theories are equally valid because I am not an expert "argument ad ignoratum"
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2018 at 21:24 | comment | added | Dave B | This question might also be related to and help you think about your argument with your friend: philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/14262/… ("if [...] the idea that anything we believe we know, at any point in history, could be wrong, why should we continue pursuing science?") | |
| Nov 28, 2018 at 22:43 | history | edited | Frank Hubeny |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 28, 2018 at 21:55 | answer | added | Frank Hubeny | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 28, 2018 at 21:55 | history | edited | Frank Hubeny | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
grammar for clarification
|
| Dec 5, 2013 at 23:18 | vote | accept | Nat | ||
| Dec 5, 2013 at 21:17 | answer | added | labreuer | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 19:41 | answer | added | Michael | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 16:22 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhilosophy/status/408632503231348736 | ||
| Dec 5, 2013 at 2:39 | answer | added | Chris Sunami | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 1:50 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 6, 2013 at 13:59 | |||||
| Dec 5, 2013 at 1:32 | history | asked | Nat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |