Timeline for Argumentum ab ignavia
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:42 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://philosophy.stackexchange.com/ with https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 6, 2015 at 19:38 | answer | added | O0123 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 15, 2013 at 22:33 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhilosophy/status/412349652240183296 | ||
| Dec 8, 2013 at 21:41 | history | edited | Nat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Dec 8, 2013 at 6:37 | comment | added | trinaldi | I don't know. I'm looking this way: "There is evidence the proposition and it is on the Internet; I will not bother searching for it, tho. Therefore, there is no evidence whether the sun will rise tomorrow." I'm not an expert on logic, but it looks more like a non sequitor to me. | |
| Dec 7, 2013 at 6:45 | comment | added | Nat | The best statement of the argument I am countering is that since the person has no evidence the proposition is unknowable in the 'universal' sense. | |
| Dec 7, 2013 at 6:43 | comment | added | Nat | Good point, altered | |
| S Dec 7, 2013 at 6:42 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixing the meaning
|
| Dec 7, 2013 at 6:41 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 7, 2013 at 6:42 | |||||
| Dec 6, 2013 at 3:56 | comment | added | ChristopherE | What does "facts on your proposition" mean? | |
| Dec 6, 2013 at 0:02 | comment | added | labreuer | I would correct 'unknowable' with 'unknown', and probably 'unknown to me'. 'Unknowable' means that there is just nothing I could do to know the thing. | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 23:39 | history | asked | Nat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |