Timeline for Existence of Time in void
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2022 at 15:24 | comment | added | SonOfThought | @YechiamWeiss: I didn't see any reference for the things I mentioned. Vacuum and perfect void need not necessarily be the same. If consciousness is not in that perfect void we can't even imagine about it. And the time it takes for light to travel in vacuum may be the highest speed our senses can perceive until another thing is discovered. The reality about perfect vacuum (if there is) need not necessarily be so. | |
| Mar 25, 2022 at 13:28 | comment | added | Yechiam Weiss | @SonOfThought please provide references, or at the very least properly laid-out arguments, not thoughts. | |
| Mar 21, 2022 at 17:24 | comment | added | SonOfThought | You forgot one thing that there is not a thing called time. ("Time, in other words, is an illusion": Einstein.) If so how can we associate it with light -- which is only some sort of energy/wave/particles? Also, if in an empty space if there is no mass and no energy what is the thing to be studied in it? Again, what is the thing that prevents empty space and non-empty space from mixing? Thanks a lot. | |
| Mar 21, 2022 at 14:50 | comment | added | SonOfThought | It was about consciousness. Do you believe that the ultimate truth can be tested according to the rules of philosophy or science? If so, I was wrong because the tester (no matter whether it is a person or a great equipment) must be greater than the ultimate truth. That means, what you suggested as the ultimate truth is not the ultimate truth. | |
| Mar 21, 2022 at 5:34 | comment | added | Jo Wehler | The proof of the pudding is in the eating: Could you please name an „ultimate truth“, which can be put to test according to the rules of philosophy or science? – I did not use the term „forever“ when singling out General Relativity, because scientific theories are never the last word: Progress in science entails that today‘s answers are superseded by future insights. | |
| Mar 21, 2022 at 3:21 | comment | added | SonOfThought | Also, you said that it is our best current models. What does it mean? Isn't there any possibility to be changed? Why didn't you use the the term 'for ever'? – | |
| Mar 21, 2022 at 3:21 | comment | added | SonOfThought | If you have a great power of imagination, surely you can. You may even apply the creator's quote: "Imagination is more important than knowledge." You believe that human mind is the ultimate. But when it comes to reality this must not be so. You didn't notice that relativity is created by a sense organ and brain (eg: eyes and brain). Would it be the same if the number of human brain cells are more or very few? If it changes, the theory may not be the final. | |
| Mar 21, 2022 at 2:53 | history | edited | SonOfThought | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| Mar 20, 2022 at 17:02 | comment | added | Jo Wehler | All of our ideas and concepts are created by our mind. General relativity provides our best current models from cosmology, with deep insights about spacetime. - Who is competent to make claims about "ultimate reality"? | |
| Mar 20, 2022 at 16:47 | history | edited | SonOfThought | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 228 characters in body
|
| Mar 20, 2022 at 16:33 | comment | added | SonOfThought | Relativity is created by our mind. At 'some level' (in ultimate reality) that also become meaningless. | |
| Mar 20, 2022 at 15:32 | comment | added | Jo Wehler | I am sceptical about your first statement. According to general relativitiy, in empty space – no mass, no energy … - spacetime is a flat manifold. Why is it relevant for the meaning of the concept of time whether there is something to experience time? | |
| Mar 20, 2022 at 15:14 | history | answered | SonOfThought | CC BY-SA 4.0 |