Skip to main content
20 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 11, 2022 at 23:59 answer added armand timeline score: 1
Oct 10, 2022 at 19:01 answer added BillOnne timeline score: 0
Oct 10, 2022 at 18:54 history edited BillOnne CC BY-SA 4.0
added 11 characters in body; edited title
Oct 10, 2022 at 13:30 comment added Gordon You have to climb up and down the tree. This is why Gauss would work on practical problems in the real world.
Oct 10, 2022 at 12:06 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jun 13, 2022 at 7:50 comment added Nikos M. In a sense truth is specific even if general, there are no abstract (in the sense of non-specific) truths.
Jun 12, 2022 at 12:03 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
May 13, 2022 at 9:57 answer added Ioannis Paizis timeline score: 0
May 13, 2022 at 5:35 comment added Double Knot From Kristian's hint, your perceived difference between concrete and abstract might only depend on their epistemic modal degrees upon you which has nothing to do with their own reality or importance per se strictly speaking. Do you count your own stated "fact"(Not a proper answer came up yet) as concrete or abstract? If your answer is abstract, then by your own titular logic it's not important at all, so why bother stated it? If your answer is concrete, then this "fact" must be important and very real, however, is it really true?...
May 12, 2022 at 20:50 comment added MIKEY SINGH Not a proper answer came up yet.
May 12, 2022 at 20:15 comment added causative Well, say I crumple up a candy wrapper and throw it in the trash. That's a very concrete, actual object. Is that particular crumpled candy wrapper more important than, say, the abstract idea of a circle? I don't think so! So the importance really depends on the specific object.
May 12, 2022 at 19:57 history edited J D CC BY-SA 4.0
added 10 characters in body; edited tags
May 12, 2022 at 17:07 history edited MIKEY SINGH
edited tags
May 12, 2022 at 16:57 comment added Double Knot This is a very general, universal and deep question indeed which everyone has their own criterion for sure... With this said, however, it doesn't mean it has to remain mystic forever. Just stare at the word "real" long and hard, contemplate and meditate, hopefully it will hint you with more relevant ideas...
May 12, 2022 at 16:51 history edited MIKEY SINGH CC BY-SA 4.0
added 8 characters in body
May 12, 2022 at 16:36 comment added Kristian Berry We can have multiple properties or relations of existence, multiple degrees of actuality, iterations of modal structures, etc. So if we have an existential quantifier and an existence predicate, we can quantify over things lacking the predicate, and predicate existence of things we don't quantify over.
May 12, 2022 at 16:31 comment added MIKEY SINGH @KristianBerry my question is about existent concrete, not about non-existent one. And I'm wondering how come something can be concrete when it isn't in existence?
May 12, 2022 at 16:26 review Low quality posts
May 12, 2022 at 17:05
May 12, 2022 at 16:14 comment added Kristian Berry A general statement like, "Unicorns have horns," can be true even if no unicorns exist. By contrast, "This unicorn still has its horn," requires an actually existent unicorn to be true. We might go the Zalta route and talk about an abstract unicorn that encodes having a horn, and this would be the existent referent of the general statement, but why are there abstract unicorns, then, over and above the nonexistent concrete ones?
May 12, 2022 at 16:05 history asked MIKEY SINGH CC BY-SA 4.0