Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 16, 2023 at 18:38 comment added Meanach You are a rare breed. Some lies are more important than others. If answering the question "Are you a Jew?" with yes will result in death, then a lie is justified in the interest of survival. If answering the question "Do you like my haircut?" with no will result in hurt feelings, then a lie is justified in the interest of compassion. The first question is an invasion of privacy, so there is no obligation to give an honest answer. The second question is a matter of opinion, so there is no objective truth. Stating that people should tell the truth at all times is unrealistic and illiberal.
Nov 16, 2023 at 18:18 comment added user67675 i don't lie @Meanach i cannot remember the last one, anyway, and not due to fatuousness. it debases every claim someone makes, and implies consent to being tricked if it is to be expected.
Nov 16, 2023 at 15:44 comment added Meanach Yes. He who says that he is not a liar is a liar. Seriously, the ability to lie is an obvious survival trait. No honest human survived.
Nov 16, 2023 at 15:38 comment added CriglCragl @Meanach: Tell me the bitter truth? We are all rascals. Tell me the sweet lie? We wish we weren't.
Nov 16, 2023 at 14:31 comment added Meanach Radical honesty would be the admission that dishonesty is ubiquitous.
Jun 7, 2022 at 21:38 comment added Nikos M. Kant·s thesis is close to my heart. I have not found a case so far where approaches other than deception cannot achieve same or better results (assuming good results)
Jun 7, 2022 at 20:35 comment added CriglCragl @NikosM.: As in, lying is never moral, like Kant?
Jun 6, 2022 at 22:45 comment added Nikos M. Some say a lie can be as grave as a murder, because it can be used to cover it up. In less grave cases then there is no reason anyway. I tend to agree with the stance of zero hypocrisy
Jun 6, 2022 at 18:19 history answered CriglCragl CC BY-SA 4.0