Timeline for What is the difference between "actus elicitus" and "actus imperatus"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2023 at 1:05 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Oct 25, 2022 at 1:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Sep 24, 2022 at 23:37 | answer | added | Geremia | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 24, 2022 at 23:28 | history | edited | Geremia | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Sep 24, 2022 at 23:22 | history | edited | Geremia | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Sep 16, 2022 at 0:12 | comment | added | Chris | Thank you so much. That is extremely helpful. | |
| Sep 15, 2022 at 22:33 | comment | added | Conifold | Chisholm expressed it more clearly:"It is one thing to ask whether the things that a man wills are things that are within his power: this is the problem of the actus imperatus. It is quite a different thing to ask whether his willing itself is something that is within his power: this is the problem of the actus elicitus." Actus elicitus is an act of willing of the second order, where instead of merely directing what we do according to our wants we direct our wants themselves. | |
| Sep 15, 2022 at 22:01 | history | asked | Chris | CC BY-SA 4.0 |