Return to Question

The Scientific American article What Happens to a Society That Does Not Believe in Free Wıll? Looks to answer the question from a research perspective and The clockwork universe: is free will an illusion? explains how free will is an illusion. What philosophers have looked at the same question, a society with no free will?

Most of the material I find is a discussion of how hard incompatibilism is incorrect. Are there writers who accept incompatibilism as true and that free will is an imagined phenomenon. From there look at how society could function and what changes it means to being human?

My question is different from the suggested question in that I am looking for philosophers who have written about the issue and not direct answers.

The Scientific American article, What Happens to a Society That Does Not Believe in Free Wıll?, looks to answer the question from a research perspective and The clockwork universe: is free will an illusion? explains how free will is an illusion. Which philosophers have looked at the same question, that of a society with no belief in free will?

Most of the material I find is a discussion of how hard incompatibilism is incorrect. Are there writers who accept incompatibilism as true and that free will is an imaginary phenomenon; and from there, looked at how a society with no belief in free will could function and what changes would follow for the meaning of what it is to be human?

My question is different from the suggested question in that I am looking for philosophers who have written about the issue and not direct answers.

The Scientific American article [What Happens to a Society That Does Not Believe in Free Wıll?] 1 Looks to answer the question from a research perspective. What philosophers have looked at the same question?

Most of the material I find is a discussion of how hard incompatibilism is incorrect. Are there writers who accept incompatibilism as true and that freewill is an imagined phenomenon. From there look at how society could function and what changes it means to being human?

My question is different from the suggested question in that I am looking for philosophers who have written about the issue and not direct answers.

The Scientific American article What Happens to a Society That Does Not Believe in Free Wıll? Looks to answer the question from a research perspective and The clockwork universe: is free will an illusion? explains how free will is an illusion. What philosophers have looked at the same question, a society with no free will?

Most of the material I find is a discussion of how hard incompatibilism is incorrect. Are there writers who accept incompatibilism as true and that free will is an imagined phenomenon. From there look at how society could function and what changes it means to being human?

My question is different from the suggested question in that I am looking for philosophers who have written about the issue and not direct answers.

The Scientific American article [What Happens to a Society That Does Not Believe in Free Wıll?] 1 Looks to answer the question from a research perspective. What philosophers have looked at the same question?

Most of the material I find is a discussion of how hard incompatibilism is incorrect. Are there writers who accept incompatibilism as true and build on that to look at how society could function and changes to what it means to being human?

The Scientific American article [What Happens to a Society That Does Not Believe in Free Wıll?] 1 Looks to answer the question from a research perspective. What philosophers have looked at the same question?

Most of the material I find is a discussion of how hard incompatibilism is incorrect. Are there writers who accept incompatibilism as true and that freewill is an imagined phenomenon. From there look at how society could function and what changes it means to being human?

My question is different from the suggested question in that I am looking for philosophers who have written about the issue and not direct answers.