Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 21 at 7:33 answer added user73173 timeline score: 1
Jan 28, 2023 at 5:34 comment added RodolfoAP Kant's Second Antinomy deals precisely with atomism. Antinomies are basically contradictions between rational phenomena that appear to be true simultaneously, while reason would be illusory (Transcendental Dialectic). The second antinomy presents the contradiction between the rational certainty that there must be an indivisible (the atom), and the notion that tells that parts are always wholes that can also be divided in parts recursively.
Jan 28, 2023 at 1:36 history edited Conifold CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 25 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Jan 27, 2023 at 20:15 comment added Frank @Conifold - Yeah that is interesting, because a lot of old philosophy that could not be informed by the latest advances in science can be regarded as "obsolete". Less to read hahaha
Jan 27, 2023 at 15:32 comment added Conifold Nothing good. "In the Metaphysical Foundations the aether clearly has a merely hypothetical status. To be sure, Kant appears to be convinced of its existence, and he accordingly vigorously opposes a natural philosophy based on atoms and the void. Yet he also firmly asserts that it is not possible to rule out such an atomistic philosophy a priori". Friedman, Kant and Exact Sciences, p. 217. Later (in the so-called Transition manuscript of 1799) he changed his mind for the worse and attempted to deduce aether and rule out atomism even a priori, ibid. p. 221.
Jan 27, 2023 at 14:28 comment added J D Maybe "Das ist Wunderschön"?
Jan 27, 2023 at 14:08 comment added Geoffrey Thomas Hello : do you need to use the German 'Modell' rather than the English 'model' ? If you do, 'modell' should be capitalised to 'Modell'. But anyhow, welcome to PSE. Best - Geoffrey
Jan 27, 2023 at 14:03 history edited Geoffrey Thomas CC BY-SA 4.0
'whether' replaces 'wether'
S Jan 27, 2023 at 13:48 review First questions
Jan 27, 2023 at 14:09
S Jan 27, 2023 at 13:48 history asked Sven CC BY-SA 4.0