Timeline for Can a psychic process never be proven purely through a chance experiment?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2023 at 5:28 | comment | added | Hudjefa | @StevanV.Saban, read psychology, what passes for it anyway. I can't seem to come out of me room | |
| Mar 13, 2023 at 4:01 | comment | added | user64314 | @AgentSmith Drat! I knew my attempt to prove my psychic ability was feeble but I couldn't resist. 😉 | |
| Mar 13, 2023 at 3:42 | comment | added | Hudjefa | @StevanV.Saban, it wasn't me that brought up math. Well, you can't prove the existence of psychic powers any more than you can prove the nonexistence of psychic powers mon ami. | |
| Mar 13, 2023 at 3:07 | comment | added | user64314 | @AgentSmith Jeez! I wasn't expecting math. But OK. It's a binary choice either you can or can't prove the existence of psychic powers. There are 49,595 users on the Philosophy SE so I had a 1/99,190 chance of predicting your answer. Respectable, but not lottery winning predicability. | |
| Mar 13, 2023 at 2:27 | comment | added | Hudjefa | @StevanV.Saban, 😁. What are the odds?! | |
| Mar 13, 2023 at 2:06 | comment | added | user64314 | @AgentSmith I knew you were going to say that!! | |
| Mar 13, 2023 at 1:46 | comment | added | Hudjefa | Nothing can prove the existence of psychic powers. | |
| Mar 13, 2023 at 1:35 | comment | added | J Kusin | I think based on your other questions you are using “prove” when there is no absolute certification to anything. Not even math (Justin Clarke Doane argues this). You need to give up “proving” anything beyond all doubt. | |
| Mar 13, 2023 at 1:23 | answer | added | user64314 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 12, 2023 at 21:18 | answer | added | Daron | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 12, 2023 at 20:21 | answer | added | Professor Sushing | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 12, 2023 at 18:25 | comment | added | Weather Vane | Given that James Randi was a stage magician, who put up his own prize money, set his own rules, was in charge of the results, and adjudicated himself; and that he is on record in an interview saying that the purpose was theatrical there is no scientific worth in any of the debunking. | |
| Mar 12, 2023 at 15:40 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 23, 2023 at 3:08 | |||||
| Mar 12, 2023 at 15:36 | comment | added | Hudjefa | Did Newton know he was Newton? ~ My brother wants to know. | |
| Mar 12, 2023 at 15:22 | history | edited | user62907 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 7 characters in body
|
| Mar 12, 2023 at 15:15 | history | edited | user62907 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 7 characters in body
|
| Mar 12, 2023 at 15:10 | history | asked | user62907 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |