Timeline for Can philosophy say that "love" doesn't exist? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
24 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 17, 2023 at 20:51 | comment | added | user65994 | i agree that the question is entirely empty | |
May 16, 2023 at 18:39 | history | closed |
armand Mary Peter - Reinstate Monica AnoE Ludwig V |
Needs more focus | |
May 16, 2023 at 13:39 | answer | added | RodolfoAP | timeline score: 0 | |
May 16, 2023 at 13:31 | comment | added | AnoE | I was about to write an answer, but re-read the question and really have no clue what you are asking... I think you have to be more specific. | |
May 16, 2023 at 12:47 | comment | added | NotThatGuy | Philosophy doesn't seem like the right place to look for the answer to this question. It's a question about how brains work and what types of emotions we can experience. That's much more within the domain of psychology and neuroscience. | |
May 16, 2023 at 11:12 | comment | added | NotThatGuy | I object to the implication that romantic relationships "transcend" friendships, and that friendships are therefore inferior to romantic relationships. These are fundamentally different relationships (for many/most people), some people have very deep and close friendships and aromantic people aren't losing out by not engaging in relations they have no interest in. You pursue a romantic relationship if you're romantically interested in someone, it has nothing to do with "transcending the ick". | |
May 16, 2023 at 8:45 | answer | added | anon | timeline score: -1 | |
May 16, 2023 at 8:04 | comment | added | Peter - Reinstate Monica | The problem with "vivid manifold phenomena" is their definition. You already broke this particular phenomenon down into narrower subsets which may be more accessible to rigorous definitions, and subsequent discussion. Therefore, your question is not answerable as-is; it is actually at least half a dozen questions. | |
May 16, 2023 at 4:21 | comment | added | user65994 | which ofc is not the same as giving up... everything is a frame for how we love others | |
May 16, 2023 at 1:33 | review | Close votes | |||
May 16, 2023 at 18:39 | |||||
May 16, 2023 at 0:53 | comment | added | user65994 | @ChristianHennig better alone than in loveless intimacy! | |
May 16, 2023 at 0:49 | answer | added | Scott Rowe | timeline score: 3 | |
May 15, 2023 at 22:53 | comment | added | Christian Hennig | I have no idea what it even means to say that love "exists" or "does not exist". | |
May 15, 2023 at 22:11 | comment | added | user65994 | It may not have the attributes that we predicate of it or want it to have. It may be that, like honesty, all people are fundamentally unloving (dishonest). And it may be that no-one can live up to your definition of love. If you're asking whether, like goodness, it is subjective, I don't see what difference that makes and would struggle to believe otherwise. | |
May 15, 2023 at 21:31 | answer | added | user65994 | timeline score: 1 | |
May 15, 2023 at 21:17 | history | became hot network question | |||
May 15, 2023 at 17:22 | review | Suggested edits | |||
May 15, 2023 at 19:08 | |||||
May 15, 2023 at 16:34 | comment | added | Daron | Your "different types of love" are about 3000 years out of date my friend. | |
May 15, 2023 at 16:28 | answer | added | J D | timeline score: 6 | |
May 15, 2023 at 15:32 | comment | added | niels nielsen | "philosophy" can say anything it wants. | |
May 15, 2023 at 14:27 | answer | added | Joseph Weissman♦ | timeline score: 3 | |
May 15, 2023 at 13:40 | comment | added | CriglCragl | 'The Prairie Vole Model of Pair-Bonding and Its Sensitivity to Addictive Substances' frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02477 | |
May 15, 2023 at 13:18 | comment | added | CriglCragl | "I hate to break it to you, but what people calls 'love' is just a chemical reaction that compels animals to breed. It hits hard, Morty, then it slowly fades, leaving you stranded in a failing marriage. I did it. Your parents are gonna do it. Break the cycle, Morty. Rise above. Focus on science." ;) | |
May 15, 2023 at 13:12 | history | asked | ActualCry | CC BY-SA 4.0 |