Skip to main content
30 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 7, 2023 at 19:17 comment added Dave Let us continue this discussion in chat.
Jun 7, 2023 at 19:13 comment added Dave @Mark because vague statements in general aren't easily falsified. That's why my first comment is "was designed" is underspecified. You literally put etc. in your list of potential agents making it unbounded. So there is now way to rule that out since you can always slip another agent into the list. This is to say nothing of putting the ultimate wildcard "God" in there, at this stage saying it appeared there "through magic" would sit comfortably in your list of agents.
Jun 7, 2023 at 18:53 comment added user66156 @Dave Why should I pick one specific category? What's the problem with the wider, more abstract category of "intelligent agent"? Besides, for any category one chooses, someone else can always object that the category is not specific enough. Even if I say "the agent must be an alien", you could say, "an alien from what planetary system? be more specific". If say, "the agent must be human", you could say "a human from which country? be more specific", etc.
Jun 7, 2023 at 18:33 comment added Dave @Mark pick one, make a specific hypothesis about who/why/where/how and then you'll see that it can be shown to be false.
Jun 7, 2023 at 18:26 comment added user66156 @Dave 1) Designed by some intelligent agent, e.g., AI, aliens, humans(?), God(?), etc. 2) Do you mean if we could show that Paris is not French? In principle, if you produce evidence that Paris belongs to a different country, then sure. I'm not well-versed in international law and diplomacy, but for sure there must be some kind of official documentation capable of certifying that certain place belongs to certain country. If you could produce a document that certifies that Paris belongs to e.g. Germany, and if this were a well-known fact among Germans, that would falsify that Paris is French.
Jun 7, 2023 at 18:15 comment added Dave Designed by what? "was designed" seems intrinsically underspecified
Jun 7, 2023 at 16:59 answer added J D timeline score: 1
Jun 6, 2023 at 20:11 comment added user66156 @BobaFit Well, we could falsify that we are in THAT Paris if we were able to produce evidence that we are not in that Paris, for example, if we had satellite evidence that we are somewhere else.
Jun 6, 2023 at 20:05 comment added Boba Fit google.com/maps/place/Paris,+France/@48.8588255,2.2646348,12z/… THAT Paris, France.
Jun 6, 2023 at 19:56 vote accept CommunityBot
Jun 6, 2023 at 19:37 comment added user66156 @BobaFit Are you referring to whether we find such a city on Mars or on Earth? Do we have access to satellite information about the location of the city in your thought experiment?
Jun 6, 2023 at 19:16 comment added Boba Fit If we encounter what appears to be Paris, France, would the claim that it was French be falsifiable? In other words, I can answer your question if you can answer the equivalent question for something routinely available.
Jun 6, 2023 at 14:54 answer added Barmar timeline score: 12
Jun 6, 2023 at 13:05 answer added Professor Sushing timeline score: 1
Jun 6, 2023 at 6:10 answer added tkruse timeline score: 7
Jun 6, 2023 at 5:53 comment added Jeremy Friesner Is "aliens hiding monoliths on Mars for fun" not itself a natural process?
Jun 6, 2023 at 2:47 answer added Davislor timeline score: 3
Jun 6, 2023 at 0:50 history became hot network question
Jun 5, 2023 at 23:19 answer added Roger timeline score: 6
Jun 5, 2023 at 20:25 comment added Ludwig V I'm wondering what an advanced extraterrestrial device would look like.
Jun 5, 2023 at 20:03 comment added Scott Rowe I'm wondering if this Question was designed for something.
Jun 5, 2023 at 19:11 comment added Conifold Sure. After scientists study processes on Mars that shape natural formations and create a model that shows how the "device" emerged from them, see geofacts.
Jun 5, 2023 at 18:56 review Close votes
Jun 16, 2023 at 3:09
Jun 5, 2023 at 18:56 answer added Pertti Ruismäki timeline score: 4
Jun 5, 2023 at 18:44 comment added sdenham I doubt relocating Paley's watchmaker analogy to Mars will lead to anything that has not already been said.
Jun 5, 2023 at 18:38 history edited user66156 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 657 characters in body
Jun 5, 2023 at 17:21 answer added causative timeline score: 9
Jun 5, 2023 at 17:15 history edited user66156 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 24 characters in body
Jun 5, 2023 at 16:52 history edited user66156 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 3 characters in body
Jun 5, 2023 at 16:45 history asked user66156 CC BY-SA 4.0