Timeline for A confliction on Univocity of Being by Deleuze between DR and LS
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9 at 18:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| May 12 at 18:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Apr 12 at 17:59 | history | edited | Kang | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 549 characters in body
|
| Mar 29 at 19:13 | answer | added | Kang | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 29 at 18:19 | comment | added | Double Knot | This may simply due to his change of views since Difference and Repetition is his later work after about 5 years emphasizing Spinoza's positively affirmative univalence designation of univocal being as a way to contrast it with Scotus' completely neutral understanding of the same. Hermeneutically the context of P1 is that which belongs to logic which is naturally neutral while the context of P2 is that which belongs to meta... | |
| Mar 29 at 15:21 | comment | converted from answer | ac15 | > How to mitigate this confliction? Give up Deleuze. Read 'his' chapter on Sokal & Bricmont's "Intellectual impostures"/"Fashionable nonsense" if you need more evidence to do so | |
| Mar 29 at 14:56 | history | edited | Kang | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Mar 29 at 14:51 | history | edited | Kang | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Mar 29 at 14:50 | history | edited | Kang | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| S Mar 29 at 14:49 | review | First questions | |||
| Mar 29 at 19:16 | |||||
| S Mar 29 at 14:49 | history | asked | Kang | CC BY-SA 4.0 |