Skip to main content
I'm not familiar with Stack Exchange and couldn't write well.
Source Link

Quantum language ( i.e.There are many different types of Copenhagen interpretations, and they are a mixture of good and bad. I believe that the linguistic Copenhagen interpretation ofis best: Fig As seen in this figure, QL (= quantum mechanics) was proposed aslanguage with the metaphysical and linguistic turnCopenhagen interpretation) is the final destination of Western philosophy. And it produces QM (with the Copenhagen interpretation), logic and statistics. This turn Far from physics to language does not only realizebeing outdated, it is at the remarkable extensionforefront of quantum mechanics but also yieldthe times. the linguistic turnHowever, cutting-edge theories must pass all sorts of Descartes=Kant epistemologyrigorous checks. Also, this has a merit that the wave function collapse can be completely understoodThe linguistic Copenhagen interpretation is waiting for your rigorous check.    (See cf. https://ishikawa.math.keio.ac.jp/indexe.html )

Quantum language ( i.e., the linguistic Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics) was proposed as the metaphysical and linguistic turn of the Copenhagen interpretation. This turn from physics to language does not only realize the remarkable extension of quantum mechanics but also yield the linguistic turn of Descartes=Kant epistemology. Also, this has a merit that the wave function collapse can be completely understood.  (See https://ishikawa.math.keio.ac.jp/indexe.html )

There are many different types of Copenhagen interpretations, and they are a mixture of good and bad. I believe that the linguistic Copenhagen interpretation is best: Fig As seen in this figure, QL (= quantum language with the linguistic Copenhagen interpretation) is the final destination of Western philosophy. And it produces QM (with the Copenhagen interpretation), logic and statistics. Far from being outdated, it is at the forefront of the times. However, cutting-edge theories must pass all sorts of rigorous checks. The linguistic Copenhagen interpretation is waiting for your rigorous check.  ( cf. https://ishikawa.math.keio.ac.jp/indexe.html )

Quantum language ( i.e., the linguistic Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics) was proposed as the metaphysical and linguistic turn of the Copenhagen interpretation. This turn from physics to language does not only realize the remarkable extension of quantum mechanics but also yield the linguistic turn of Descartes=Kant epistemology. Also, this has a merit that the wave function collapse can be completely understood. (See https://ishikawa.math.keio.ac.jp/indexe.html )

Quantum language ( i.e., the linguistic Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics) was proposed as the metaphysical and linguistic turn of the Copenhagen interpretation. This turn from physics to language does not only realize the remarkable extension of quantum mechanics but also yield the linguistic turn of Descartes=Kant epistemology. Also, this has a merit that the wave function collapse can be completely understood.

Quantum language ( i.e., the linguistic Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics) was proposed as the metaphysical and linguistic turn of the Copenhagen interpretation. This turn from physics to language does not only realize the remarkable extension of quantum mechanics but also yield the linguistic turn of Descartes=Kant epistemology. Also, this has a merit that the wave function collapse can be completely understood. (See https://ishikawa.math.keio.ac.jp/indexe.html )

Source Link

Quantum language ( i.e., the linguistic Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics) was proposed as the metaphysical and linguistic turn of the Copenhagen interpretation. This turn from physics to language does not only realize the remarkable extension of quantum mechanics but also yield the linguistic turn of Descartes=Kant epistemology. Also, this has a merit that the wave function collapse can be completely understood.