Quantum language ( i.e.There are many different types of Copenhagen interpretations, and they are a mixture of good and bad. I believe that the linguistic Copenhagen interpretation ofis best: As seen in this figure, QL (= quantum mechanics) was proposed aslanguage with the metaphysical and linguistic turnCopenhagen interpretation) is the final destination of Western philosophy. And it produces QM (with the Copenhagen interpretation), logic and statistics. This turn Far from physics to language does not only realizebeing outdated, it is at the remarkable extensionforefront of quantum mechanics but also yieldthe times. the linguistic turnHowever, cutting-edge theories must pass all sorts of Descartes=Kant epistemologyrigorous checks. Also, this has a merit that the wave function collapse can be completely understoodThe linguistic Copenhagen interpretation is waiting for your rigorous check. (See cf. https://ishikawa.math.keio.ac.jp/indexe.html )
I'm not familiar with Stack Exchange and couldn't write well.
(See https://ishikawa.math.keio.ac.jp/indexe.html )