There are many different types of Copenhagen interpretations, and they are a mixture of good and bad. I believe that the linguistic Copenhagen interpretation is best:
As seen in this figure, QL (= quantum language with the linguistic Copenhagen interpretation) is the final destination of Western philosophy. And it produces QM (with the Copenhagen interpretation), logic and statistics.
Far from being outdated, it is at the forefront of the times.
However, cutting-edge theories must pass all sorts of rigorous checks. The linguistic Copenhagen interpretation is waiting for your rigorous check. ( cf. https://ishikawa.math.keio.ac.jp/indexe.html )
3 of 3
I'm not familiar with Stack Exchange and couldn't write well.
Witt
- 1