Timeline for Can physical aspects of the brain reveal everything about what one's subjective experience is like?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 22, 2018 at 2:35 | answer | added | RodolfoAP | timeline score: 0 | |
Aug 21, 2018 at 10:00 | review | Close votes | |||
Aug 26, 2018 at 3:05 | |||||
Aug 21, 2018 at 0:07 | comment | added | Conifold | @rus9384 McGinn does not assume physicalism, and indeed argues for its implausibility, so such an assumption begs the question. And physicalist's position is not that "humans perceive colors in similar ways" in the relevant sense of "what it feels like", it is that asking if something feels different or the same to different subjects is a meaningless question that twists the language. | |
Aug 21, 2018 at 0:03 | comment | added | rus9384 | @Conifold, there are differences, however, exactly as people can have different taste for food they probably can perceive it differently. But I still think if so, there are physical differences in brains causing that. | |
Aug 21, 2018 at 0:00 | comment | added | rus9384 | @Conifold, eye receptors are connected to neurons and the fact that in all humans the same receptors are activated by the same (or almost the same) wavelength is yet undisputed. Further science shoild investigate if neurons connected to them are similar. If so, assuming physicalism we are done: humans perceive colors in similar ways. However, given that different colors also have different secondary effects (grey sky makes people more sad, for example) it is already plausible these experiences are similar for all people (I don't assume blind and colorblind). | |
Aug 20, 2018 at 23:00 | answer | added | user9166 | timeline score: 1 | |
Aug 20, 2018 at 21:17 | comment | added | Conifold | McGinn overreaches with his rhetoric, but the core of his argument refers to "what these states feel like to you" as to what is unknowable. It does seem plausible that we can find physical correlates to say "manic" but on reflection these correlates correlate neural patterns to overt behavior, not to "what it feels like". Indeed, since we have no access to "what it feels like" other than, well, feeling it, and the feeling can only be done in the first person, it is by design impossible to correlate it to anything physical. We know not if what we both call "red" "feels the same" to both of us. | |
Aug 20, 2018 at 20:09 | answer | added | Cort Ammon | timeline score: 6 | |
Aug 20, 2018 at 20:05 | answer | added | Bram28 | timeline score: 2 | |
Aug 20, 2018 at 19:38 | answer | added | present | timeline score: 1 | |
Aug 20, 2018 at 19:28 | history | edited | MacroGuy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 125 characters in body
|
Aug 20, 2018 at 19:18 | history | edited | MacroGuy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Made title slightly more succinct
|
Aug 20, 2018 at 19:06 | history | asked | MacroGuy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |