Skip to main content
added 5 characters in body; edited title
Source Link

Does Multi-World Interpretation really resulteliminate randomness in a deterministic realityquantum mechanics?

As I understood it, the Multi World Interpretation (MWI) was meant to avoid the problem of resorting to randomness, by replacing the random wavefunction collapse in Copenhagen Interpretation with multiple universes where all possibilities in the wavefunction do happen.

However, I wonder if it actually accomplished what it set out to do. MWI still leaves us with a major question of "which universe does my consciousness experience?", in which randomness can very much play a part.

If that is the case, does MWI really have anything to offer over Copenhagen Interpretation in addressing theeliminating randomness issuein quantum mechanics?

Does Multi-World Interpretation really result in a deterministic reality?

As I understood it, the Multi World Interpretation (MWI) was meant to avoid the problem of resorting to randomness, by replacing the random wavefunction collapse in Copenhagen Interpretation with multiple universes where all possibilities in the wavefunction do happen.

However, I wonder if it actually accomplished what it set out to do. MWI still leaves us with a major question of "which universe does my consciousness experience?", in which randomness can very much play a part.

If that is the case, does MWI really have anything to offer over Copenhagen Interpretation in addressing the randomness issue?

Does Multi-World Interpretation really eliminate randomness in quantum mechanics?

As I understood it, the Multi World Interpretation (MWI) was meant to avoid the problem of resorting to randomness, by replacing the random wavefunction collapse in Copenhagen Interpretation with multiple universes where all possibilities in the wavefunction do happen.

However, I wonder if it actually accomplished what it set out to do. MWI still leaves us with a major question of "which universe does my consciousness experience?", in which randomness can very much play a part.

If that is the case, does MWI have anything to offer over Copenhagen Interpretation in eliminating randomness in quantum mechanics?

deleted 23 characters in body; edited title
Source Link

Does Multi-World Interpretation really result in a universe where "god didn't play dice"deterministic reality?

As I understood it, the Multi World Interpretation (MWI) was meant to avoid the problem of resorting to randomness (god didn't play dice), by replacing the random wavefunction collapse in Copenhagen Interpretation with multiple universes where all possibilities in the wavefunction do happen.

However, I wonder if it actually accomplished what it set out to do. MWI still leaves us with a major question of "which universe does my consciousness experience?", in which randomness can very much play a part.

If that is the case, does MWI really have anything to offer over Copenhagen Interpretation in addressing the randomness issue?

Does Multi-World Interpretation really result in a universe where "god didn't play dice"?

As I understood it, the Multi World Interpretation (MWI) was meant to avoid the problem of resorting to randomness (god didn't play dice), by replacing the random wavefunction collapse in Copenhagen Interpretation with multiple universes where all possibilities in the wavefunction do happen.

However, I wonder if it actually accomplished what it set out to do. MWI still leaves us with a major question of "which universe does my consciousness experience?", in which randomness can very much play a part.

If that is the case, does MWI really have anything to offer over Copenhagen Interpretation in addressing the randomness issue?

Does Multi-World Interpretation really result in a deterministic reality?

As I understood it, the Multi World Interpretation (MWI) was meant to avoid the problem of resorting to randomness, by replacing the random wavefunction collapse in Copenhagen Interpretation with multiple universes where all possibilities in the wavefunction do happen.

However, I wonder if it actually accomplished what it set out to do. MWI still leaves us with a major question of "which universe does my consciousness experience?", in which randomness can very much play a part.

If that is the case, does MWI really have anything to offer over Copenhagen Interpretation in addressing the randomness issue?

Source Link

Does Multi-World Interpretation really result in a universe where "god didn't play dice"?

As I understood it, the Multi World Interpretation (MWI) was meant to avoid the problem of resorting to randomness (god didn't play dice), by replacing the random wavefunction collapse in Copenhagen Interpretation with multiple universes where all possibilities in the wavefunction do happen.

However, I wonder if it actually accomplished what it set out to do. MWI still leaves us with a major question of "which universe does my consciousness experience?", in which randomness can very much play a part.

If that is the case, does MWI really have anything to offer over Copenhagen Interpretation in addressing the randomness issue?